2010
DOI: 10.4324/9780203831410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innocence, Heterosexuality, and the Queerness of Children's Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also interesting to note that various theorists have interpreted the many representations of the monstrous female as a reflection of envy of women's reproductive power (see Ussher, 2006). 10 For a detailed reading of the "invisible sexuality" in children's literature, see Pugh, 2011. olent figure without any of the robustness usually perceived as a masculine trait. His lack of a nose and fondness for snakes certainly raise a Freudian eyebrow, as does his tendency to twirl his (and on one occasion, Harry's) wand 11 between his "long, pale fingers", and much is made of his "high, cold voice" (compare this to Darth Vader's imposing masculinity and his famous basso profundo).…”
Section: He Who Must Not Be Named: Tom Riddle's Monstrous Villainymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also interesting to note that various theorists have interpreted the many representations of the monstrous female as a reflection of envy of women's reproductive power (see Ussher, 2006). 10 For a detailed reading of the "invisible sexuality" in children's literature, see Pugh, 2011. olent figure without any of the robustness usually perceived as a masculine trait. His lack of a nose and fondness for snakes certainly raise a Freudian eyebrow, as does his tendency to twirl his (and on one occasion, Harry's) wand 11 between his "long, pale fingers", and much is made of his "high, cold voice" (compare this to Darth Vader's imposing masculinity and his famous basso profundo).…”
Section: He Who Must Not Be Named: Tom Riddle's Monstrous Villainymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Readers, young and old, are insisting on the primacy of their own interpretations, which often rely on the coalitional politics espoused by Harry and his allies in the septet. Yet others align themselves with exclusionary politics, citing authority figures like Warner Brothers, Rowling, and the admittedly contradictorily heteronormative and white-centered books themselves (Duggan, 2019;Galway, 2012;Horne, 2010;Pugh andWallace, 2006, 2008;Rana, 2011;Thomas, 2019). These exclusions are particularly apparent when fans exclude either fans or fan-created representations of characters who are members of traditionally marginalized groups (Fowler, 2019;Walton, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only children but also straight and queer adult recipients alike have responded massively -especially on social network sites on the web -to the series about a boy who once lived in a cupboard and became the greatest wizard of all time. On the one hand, Harry Potter has been widely criticized for its depiction of desire as "uncontroversially heterosexual" (Gupta 2009: 128), and thus for its reinforcement of heteronormativity as the only desirable life concept and for its rather conservative depiction of gender roles (Heilman 2003;Pugh/Wallace 2006;Pugh 2011). On the other hand, although there are no explicitly or openly gay characters in the original text, some critics have praised Harry's process of becoming a wizard as a strong metaphor for the act of coming out (Bronski 2003) and pointed to the protagonist's non-hegemonic masculinity (Gallardo/Smith 2003;Wannamaker 2008).…”
Section: Gender 2 | 2017 1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%