2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innervation zone shift with changes in joint angle in the brachial biceps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, the distribution of IZs has been reported for several human muscles [67,69,70], general distributions of IZs are not necessarily valid for all individuals because of a large variability in the location of major IZs within and between subjects [70]. Additionally, a shift in IZs can occur with dynamic changes in joint angle [71] and even in static conditions when isometric contraction level is increased [72]. Muscle undergoes substantial three-dimensional changes in its geometry, especially during dynamic contractions, and thus sEMG electrodes are shifted with respect to the underlying muscle fibers and IZs [73].…”
Section: Placement Of Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, the distribution of IZs has been reported for several human muscles [67,69,70], general distributions of IZs are not necessarily valid for all individuals because of a large variability in the location of major IZs within and between subjects [70]. Additionally, a shift in IZs can occur with dynamic changes in joint angle [71] and even in static conditions when isometric contraction level is increased [72]. Muscle undergoes substantial three-dimensional changes in its geometry, especially during dynamic contractions, and thus sEMG electrodes are shifted with respect to the underlying muscle fibers and IZs [73].…”
Section: Placement Of Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subject NNS, see figure 4). On the other hand, the location of the innervation-zone relative to the supra adjacent skin can be displaced from 5 to 30 mm as a result of elbow flexion (Martin & MacIsaac, 2006). In our study this factor was controlled by fixing the elbow position at 170º of flexion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Signals collected by the electrode were processed by a Prima EMG16 multi-channel acquisition system described by (Martin and MacIsaac, 2006) with differential gains between 1000 and 10,000. Seven channels of single-differential sEMG were then sent to the computer for digital storage using a National Instruments DAQ-6024E PCMCIA data acquisition card sampling at 1024 Hz.…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%