Wachtel (2017) and Rhonda Goldman (2017) have provided thoughtful critiques of our concept of the importance of therapist neutrality within an empathic context. Although there are many points of agreement, our reply highlights our disagreements with these reactions. When accompanied by flexible guidelines, not conflated with uncaring indifference, and offered in a context of what we term an empathic atmosphere, neutrality is a highly effective therapeutic stance. In contrast to Wachtel, we conclude that the therapist can indeed get far in neutral, so long as it is a benevolent neutrality that is marked by therapist empathy, caring, and affirmation.