2013
DOI: 10.17159/2413-3108/2013/v25i3a361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Injury prevention in football: Knowledge and behaviour of players and availability of medical care in a Nigerian youth football league

Abstract: Background. Exposure to competitive football is increasing among male youth football players in Nigeria. However, medical support to abate the impact of injuries appears inadequate and there is limited literature to show whether youth football players are knowledgeable about, and practise effective measures for injury prevention in football (IPF). Objective. To assess the knowledge and behaviour of male youth football players regarding IPF and the availability of medical care for players. Methods. We conducted… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The methodological quality of quantitative studies was assessed using a modified Downs and Black (DB) quality assessment tool (online resource 2) [38]. The score for each article was calculated to a maximum of 28 points and subsequently given a rating based on the total score: poor ( ≤ 14), fair (15)(16)(17)(18)(19), good (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25), or excellent (26-28) [39]. Levels of evidence were categorised according to the guidelines of the Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine (online resource 3) [40].…”
Section: Study Design and Quality Appraisalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The methodological quality of quantitative studies was assessed using a modified Downs and Black (DB) quality assessment tool (online resource 2) [38]. The score for each article was calculated to a maximum of 28 points and subsequently given a rating based on the total score: poor ( ≤ 14), fair (15)(16)(17)(18)(19), good (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25), or excellent (26-28) [39]. Levels of evidence were categorised according to the guidelines of the Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine (online resource 3) [40].…”
Section: Study Design and Quality Appraisalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the 11 + warm-up programme demonstrated a 25 % injury reduction in youth and adult football [17]. However, there has been poor programme adoption worldwide despite the football world governing body developing and disseminating the programme [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owoeye et al [ 16 ] elucidated the knowledge of 11+ in Nigeria. Their survey was administered to athletes only, which is of relevance because the team coaches and health professionals represent the decisive stakeholders for implementation [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for these discrepancies between countries are likely multifactorial and may encompass differences in the total amount of training exposure and the periodisation of the competitive season [ 4 ], the number of matches played per season affecting recovery times between competitions [ 8 , 9 ], and regional differences in the style of play [ 10 , 11 ]. Ultimately, knowledge about and application of appropriate injury-prevention programmes as well as the availability and quality of medical care may also strongly influence the incidence of football-related injuries [ 12 ]. Taken together, these results demonstrate the inherent difficulties in extrapolating epidemiological data obtained in one country to other leagues or playing environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%