Is the message getting through? Awareness and use of the 11+ injury prevention programme in amateur level football clubs

Abstract

A large body of evidence suggests that the 11+ warm-up programme is effective in preventing football-related musculoskeletal injuries. However, despite considerable efforts to promote and disseminate the programme, it is unclear as to whether team head coaches are familiar with the 11+ and how they rate its feasibility. The present study aimed to gather information on awareness and usage among German amateur level football coaches. A questionnaire was administered to 7893 individuals who were in charge of youth and adult non-professional teams. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyse the obtained data. A total of 1223 coaches (16%) returned the questionnaire. There was no risk of a non-response bias (p>.05). At the time of the survey, nearly half of the participants (42.6%) knew the 11+. Among the coaches who were familiar with the programme, three of four reported applying it regularly (at least once per week). Holding a license (φ = .28, p < .0001), high competitive level (Cramer-V = .13, p = .007), and coaching a youth team (φ = .1, p = .001) were associated with usage of 11+. Feasibility and suitability of the 11+ were rated similarly by aware and unaware coaches. Although a substantial share of German amateur level coaches is familiar with the 11+, more than half of the surveyed participants did not know the programme. As the non-usage does not appear to stem from a lack of rated feasibility and suitability, existing communication strategies might need to be revised.

Sports Injury Prevention is Complex: We Need to Invest in Better Processes, Not Singular Solutions

“…The thrust of this field of investigation has been to better understand the barriers to injury prevention program implementation and develop methods to overcome these [22]. Proposed solutions to the implementation problem include further studies to assess intervention adherence [77], coach education programs [74], improved communication strategies [78], increased injury prevention advocacy [53], intervention mapping [13,39] and the establishment of knowledge transfer groups [79]. In addition, economic arguments have been used to drive mandatory implementation by national governing bodies [80].…”

Why Are You Running and Does It Hurt? Pain, Motivations and Beliefs about Injury Prevention among Participants of a Large-Scale Public Running Event

“…The questionnaire was created using the approach of a previous study [17]. After a thorough literature review, a group consensus process was initiated.…”

How does a 4-week motor–cognitive training affect choice reaction, dynamic balance and cognitive performance ability? A randomized controlled trial in well-trained, young, healthy participants

“…The participants rated exercise enjoyment regarding the finished workout as well as anticipation of the next session on an ordinal scale from 1 (no fun/anticipation) to 5 (maximal fun/anticipation). 16 To assess self-reported exertion, Borg ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were assessed using a 6–20-point Likert-type scale.…”