2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2011.02.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Injury and immediate mortality associated with recreational troll capture of bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) in a reservoir in the Kootenay-Rocky Mountain region of British Columbia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the study period, reservoir levels reached maximum elevation (754 m) on 4 November 2011 and the reservoir was drawn down to a minimum level (722 m) on 21 April 2011. Further details about the study site have been described (Gutowsky et al , , ; Harrison et al , , ; Martins et al , , ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the study period, reservoir levels reached maximum elevation (754 m) on 4 November 2011 and the reservoir was drawn down to a minimum level (722 m) on 21 April 2011. Further details about the study site have been described (Gutowsky et al , , ; Harrison et al , , ; Martins et al , , ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bull trout, a species of high recreational value (Gutowsky, Harrison, Landsman, Power, & Cooke, 2011) are threatened throughout much of their western North American range (Post & Gow, 2012). Bull trout are often found in hydropower reservoirs of western Canada and the north-western USA.…”
Section: Entrainment Vulnerability Of Bull Troutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fish were scored for the presence of injury using a standardised objective scoring system, where a score of 0 indicated no discernible injury; a score of 1 indicated a minor injury such as minor tearing of tissue (i.e. <5 mm in length, including any visible tissue tear or abrasion resulting from hooking); a score of 2 indicated moderate injury such as the presence of bleeding, bruising or a tissue tear >5 mm in length; and a score of 3 indicated major injury, such as ocular or gill damage with significant pulsatile bleeding (as per Gutowsky et al 2011). A standardised scoring system was also applied to describe the ease of hook removal, where a score of 0 referred to a hook that was removed easily and immediately (i.e.…”
Section: Rapid Assessment Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%