2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12289-010-0829-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Injection Molding of Engineering Rubber Components: A Comparison Between Experimental Results and Numerical Simulation

Abstract: The present paper reports and discusses the results of a 3D finite element simulation of the injection molding process of a rubber component, including the stages of the mold filling dynamics and material curing, using the "Reactive Molding" module of the Moldflow 6.2 CAE software. A differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) and a capillary rheometer are employed to characterize the rubber material in order to obtain appropriate curing reaction and viscosity models, respectively. The model parameters so obtained… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The viscosity curve of the injected rubber material has been measured by a dual‐bore rheometer. The reactive viscosity model is fitted via nonlinear least square fitting on this data. The model is defined by Eq.…”
Section: Simulations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The viscosity curve of the injected rubber material has been measured by a dual‐bore rheometer. The reactive viscosity model is fitted via nonlinear least square fitting on this data. The model is defined by Eq.…”
Section: Simulations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bagley [19] and Rabinowitsch [20] corrections were applied to calculate the adjusted viscosity data. e reactive viscosity model [18,[21][22][23]] is used to describe the rheological properties of rubber compounds in the Plastics Insight (MPI) Reactive Molding Moldflow software in order to simulate the mold filling dynamics. e Reactive Viscosity Model is given by…”
Section: Rheological Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, proper measurements of material viscosity and curing rate are required in order to run a simulation. A differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) and a capillary rheometer are employed to characterize the rubber material in order to obtain appropriate curing reaction and viscosity models, respectively, following an experimental approach already developed by the authors for the simulation of injection molding process [18]. e model parameters thus obtained are used to simulate the injection compression molding process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of high molding efficiency, injection molding also has some disadvantages similar to compression molding, such as, high mold cost and difficulty in demolding products with complex structures, and so on. [3][4][5][6][7] Apparently, it is more flexible and efficient to process rubber products by 3D printing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since it can only process products with a constant cross‐section, the application of extrusion molding in rubber processing is limited. In spite of high molding efficiency, injection molding also has some disadvantages similar to compression molding, such as, high mold cost and difficulty in demolding products with complex structures, and so on 3–7 . Apparently, it is more flexible and efficient to process rubber products by 3D printing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%