2017
DOI: 10.1177/1046496417721746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initiating and Maintaining Collaborations and Facilitating Understanding in Interdisciplinary Group Research

Abstract: In this article of the “Interdisciplinary Insights Into Group and Team Dynamics” special issue, we provide guidance for computer scientists and social scientists who seek an interdisciplinary approach to group research. We include how-to guidelines for researchers interested in initiating and maintaining collaborations, and discuss opportunities and pitfalls of interdisciplinary group research. Last, we include a brief case study that portrays some of the complications of creating shared understanding.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Commonly, these issues lead to a focus on multidisciplinarity rather than true interdisciplinarity (Beck, Meinecke, Matsuyama, & Lee, 2017). In other words, these issues lead to a focus on factions from different backgrounds completing projects germane to their own area and later combining those projects into an overarching finished product.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Commonly, these issues lead to a focus on multidisciplinarity rather than true interdisciplinarity (Beck, Meinecke, Matsuyama, & Lee, 2017). In other words, these issues lead to a focus on factions from different backgrounds completing projects germane to their own area and later combining those projects into an overarching finished product.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, multidisciplinary work takes an additive approach to combining expertise without the necessity of communication or coordination among researchers (Choi & Pak, 2006; Klein, 2010). Alternatively, interdisciplinary work requires the integration of knowledge, theories, and methodologies from multiple fields (Beck et al, 2017; Klein, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interdisciplinary teams with varied expertise and training have the potential to recombine their knowledge in novel ways to create truly innovative outcomes (Taylor & Greve, 2006; West, 2002; Yong et al, 2014). Teams research suggests (a) teams composed of members with different knowledge and expertise have greater innovative potential (Mello & Rentsch, 2015; van Dijk et al, 2012; van Knippenberg, 2017), and (b) realizing this potential depends upon teams’ ability to share and integrate distinct member expertise in pursuit of team goals (Baumann & Bonner, 2013; Beck et al, 2017; Lehmann-Willenbrock et al, 2017). Research also suggests that teams are not naturally adept at sharing and integrating their knowledge resources (Mesmer-Magnus & DeChurch, 2009; Stasser & Titus, 1985).…”
Section: Interdisciplinary Teams and Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research committee's proposal may include a preliminary version of a conceptual framework, a common methodology, and a strategy to synthesize data from different research projects. After program start, the research committee states common objectives for all projects, coordinates activities between projects, assigns tasks, provides background knowledge on the topic and establishes a common terminology (Beck et al 2017;Bennett and Gadlin 2012;Hall et al 2012).…”
Section: Research Committee Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%