2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial subordinate clauses in Old French: Syntactic variation and the clausal left periphery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A final property in which Old French patterns separately from Standard Modern French concerns the preverbal field. As acknowledged in traditional descriptive works (Foulet 1928: 306-32;Wartburg 1958: 103;Moignet 1973: 357;Sk arup 1975: 9-69) and theoretical analyses (Vanelli et al 1986: §4.1;Adams 1987bAdams : 4-5, 1988Roberts 1993: 85-7;Hulk & Van Kemenade 1995: 235-6;Vance 1997: 43-7;Donaldson 2012Donaldson : 1025Mathieu 2012: 327;Salvesen 2013: 135-6;Steiner 2014: xviii), the preverbal field in Old French is not a privileged subject position. Rather, consistent with other V2 languages (Vikner 1995: 41;Frey 2004 A range of particles also occur in the preverbal field that have proven problematic to analyse.…”
Section: Left-peripheral Constituents and Particlesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A final property in which Old French patterns separately from Standard Modern French concerns the preverbal field. As acknowledged in traditional descriptive works (Foulet 1928: 306-32;Wartburg 1958: 103;Moignet 1973: 357;Sk arup 1975: 9-69) and theoretical analyses (Vanelli et al 1986: §4.1;Adams 1987bAdams : 4-5, 1988Roberts 1993: 85-7;Hulk & Van Kemenade 1995: 235-6;Vance 1997: 43-7;Donaldson 2012Donaldson : 1025Mathieu 2012: 327;Salvesen 2013: 135-6;Steiner 2014: xviii), the preverbal field in Old French is not a privileged subject position. Rather, consistent with other V2 languages (Vikner 1995: 41;Frey 2004 A range of particles also occur in the preverbal field that have proven problematic to analyse.…”
Section: Left-peripheral Constituents and Particlesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…If 'V-to-T movement' is a cover term for a range of verb movement operations targeting different positions within the inflectional domain, the correct characterisation of Old French 'V-to-C' movement becomes non-trivial. 3 In a cartographic approach to the left periphery (Rizzi 1997(Rizzi , 2004(Rizzi , 2006(Rizzi , 2010(Rizzi , 2013Beninc a & Poletto 2004), there are a priori a number of potential landing sites for the moved finite verb: 4 (3) [ Frame HT, Adv Scene-Setting Capitalising on the intuition that V2 effects may have different loci cross-linguistically, accounts of Old French V2 which assume Fin (Salvesen 2011(Salvesen , 2013, Focus (Beninc a 2004(Beninc a : 285-92, 2006Labelle 2007: 301-5;Donaldson 2012Donaldson : 1029 and Force (Wolfe 2016a) to be the locus of V2 have all been proposed. Therefore, an O-V-S V2 (4), could minimally be derived in three ways (5): 5 (4) messe e matines ad li reis escultet mass and matins have.3SG the king hear.PTCP 'The King has attended mass and matins' (Roland 11,139) In the analysis below, I consider these options to be non-exclusive.…”
Section: Structure Of the Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…See recent discussion in Donaldson (2012Donaldson ( :1033 who finds the poetry/prose distinction insignificant as 7 regards the makeup of the left periphery in 10th-14th century French.…”
Section: Textual Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such context, central to the present paper, involves a main declarative preceded immediately by a subordinate, as in (3). In Donaldson (2012), I argue that OF initial subordinates usually occupy a left-peripheral Frame (i.e., topic) position. The consensus that emerges is that left-peripheral material does not count for V2 purposes.…”
Section: Vin Old Frenchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1100), only about 3.5% of main declaratives are preceded by a subordinate (Donaldson, 2012(Donaldson, : 1044, the figure climbs to 12% in Villehardouin (ca. Whereas in the Chanson de Roland (ca.…”
Section: Initial Subordinate + Main Declarativementioning
confidence: 99%