2016 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/qrs-c.2016.66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial Framework for Software Quality Evaluation Based on ISO/IEC 25022 and ISO/IEC 25023

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the more the larger training datasets and optimizing model parameters are used, the better the model prediction performance [55], and our dataset can be extended to enhance the performance of the proposed prediction model. ird, literature review related to software metrics validation [7,10,12,13] shows that usually numerous quality attributes can be used to validate a software metric. Hence, we can use other reliability subcharacteristics like fault-proneness to show the utility of the redundancy metrics as reliability indicators.…”
Section: Discussion and Reats To Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, the more the larger training datasets and optimizing model parameters are used, the better the model prediction performance [55], and our dataset can be extended to enhance the performance of the proposed prediction model. ird, literature review related to software metrics validation [7,10,12,13] shows that usually numerous quality attributes can be used to validate a software metric. Hence, we can use other reliability subcharacteristics like fault-proneness to show the utility of the redundancy metrics as reliability indicators.…”
Section: Discussion and Reats To Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Software metrics are quantitative measures used to make evaluation, improvement, and prediction of different software quality attributes [11][12][13][14][15]. Numerous software metrics (or combination of them) are proposed to assess internal attributes like complexity, cohesion and size, faults count, and defect density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many works related to the development of academic software in different contexts [34,47]; however, few works such as [16,43,54] have carried out usability assessment of authoring tools, see Table 13. In many related works, usability assessment is done considering a laboratory study [5,28,42,43,54,55] where there is higher control on the experiments, frequently, a set of specific instructions are given to users with the purpose of having more strict interactions, that is, avoiding that users make actions freely. Due to the nature of this type of study, it is not possible to identify those possible defects that occur when the user interacts freely (without being subject to a series of tasks or steps to be strictly followed) with the software [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results were that functional suitability and reliability are the most used quality characteristics by the apps evaluated [18]. Therefore, these indicators are considered essential for evaluating the quality of the software based on ISO / IEC 25022 standards [19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%