2010
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial evaluation of bone ingrowth into a novel porous titanium coating

Abstract: Porous metals (sintered beads and meshes) have been used for many years for different orthopedic applications. Metal foams have been recently developed. These foams have the advantage of being more porous than the traditional coatings. Their high porosity provides more space for bone ingrowth and mechanical interlocking and presents more surface for implant‐bone contact. The objective of this study was to evaluate in vivo bone ingrowth into Ti implants covered with a novel Ti foam coating. This foam contains 5… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cylindrical implants, 4 mm in diameter and 5 mm in length, were prepared using a Ti foam process [22][23][24] (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Implant Preparation and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cylindrical implants, 4 mm in diameter and 5 mm in length, were prepared using a Ti foam process [22][23][24] (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Implant Preparation and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The materials performed well as permanent implants for disc replacement in animal models. [31][32][33] Ceramics derived from calcium phosphate mimics the mineral structure of bone, and bone cells were shown to recognize and bind to such ceramics. 34,35 Calcium phosphate-based ceramics have been previously shown to display bone integration properties 36,37 and calcium aluminate further increases osteointegration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After foaming, the binder was removed and the part was sintered to consolidate the structure. The final structure had 55% volume porosity and an average pore size of 375 lm [38].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, after revision THA, patients are left nonweightbearing for no longer than 12 weeks to allow for implant stabilization by bone ingrowth; therefore, bone graft substitutes taking longer than 12 weeks to be effective are not practical. Also, no prior DBM studies utilized the new higher porosity implants now common in revision THA [5,17,24,27,29], even though implant surface topography influences bone ingrowth [6,15,16,23,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%