1984
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3719/17/32/014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhomogeneous transition from the ferromagnetic state to the antiferromagnetic state in Mn5(Ge1-xSix)3alloys: an NMR study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The large frequency gap between the two spectrum components is due to a significant difference between the Mn magnetic moments in the two sites: 1.94μ B at the 4d site and 3.34μ B at the 6g site [9]. The observed NMR spectrum corresponds closely to the zero-field 55 Mn NMR spectrum previously reported in polycrystalline samples of this material [11]. However, further experiments carried out in presence of external magnetic field, as described in the following paragraphs, indicate the need to revisit some aspects of the interpretation given in Ref.…”
Section: Fig 4 55 Mn Nmr Spectra At the Mn I Site (Left Panels) Andsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The large frequency gap between the two spectrum components is due to a significant difference between the Mn magnetic moments in the two sites: 1.94μ B at the 4d site and 3.34μ B at the 6g site [9]. The observed NMR spectrum corresponds closely to the zero-field 55 Mn NMR spectrum previously reported in polycrystalline samples of this material [11]. However, further experiments carried out in presence of external magnetic field, as described in the following paragraphs, indicate the need to revisit some aspects of the interpretation given in Ref.…”
Section: Fig 4 55 Mn Nmr Spectra At the Mn I Site (Left Panels) Andsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…However, further experiments carried out in presence of external magnetic field, as described in the following paragraphs, indicate the need to revisit some aspects of the interpretation given in Ref. [11]. Figure 4 presents the NMR spectra recorded at a given (arbitrary) amplitude of the rf field for different values of the external dc magnetic field applied in the out-of-plane direction, i.e., along the crystallographic c axis.…”
Section: Fig 4 55 Mn Nmr Spectra At the Mn I Site (Left Panels) Andmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first nearest neighbor Mn I -Mn I interactions J 1 ͑at the shortest distance of 2.526 Å͒ are ferromagnetic ͑FM͒ and clearly dominate over the corresponding Mn I -Mn II and Mn II -Mn II interactions, confirming the assumption about the different magnitude of exchange interaction for Mn atoms in different sublattices. 14 The dependence of the exchange parameters on the interatomic distances is stronger for the Mn II sublattice, while it is weaker for the Mn I one. As it follows from Table II, in Mn 5 Ge 3 there is an AFM J 3 interaction between the Mn II atoms within z = 1 4 and z = 3 4 planes ͑perpendicular to the c-axis͒, and FM J 4 and J 6 interactions between Mn II belonging to different planes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%