1996
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830120052009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibitory Gating of an Evoked Response to Repeated Auditory Stimuli in Schizophrenic and Normal Subjects

Abstract: The normal inhibition of response to repeated auditory stimuli seems to be compromised in schizophrenia. This loss of inhibitory gating could reflect a physiological deficit of hippocampal interneurons that is consonant with other evidence for interneuron pathologic defects in schizophrenia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

8
120
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
8
120
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, schizophrenia patients and their first-degree relatives exhibit a smaller reduction in the startle response or, in other words, show reduced PPI (Cadenhead et al, 2000;Geyer and Braff, 1987;Swerdlow et al, 1994;Swerdlow and Geyer, 1998). In addition, investigators have also developed protocols to assess auditory gating directly in the brain by using surface electrodes or, in animals, intracranial electrodes, and have found similar results (Adler et al, 1982;Boutros et al, 1991;Clementz et al, 1997;Connolly et al, 2003;Erwin et al, 1991;Freedman et al, 1996;Judd et al, 1992;Stevens et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For instance, schizophrenia patients and their first-degree relatives exhibit a smaller reduction in the startle response or, in other words, show reduced PPI (Cadenhead et al, 2000;Geyer and Braff, 1987;Swerdlow et al, 1994;Swerdlow and Geyer, 1998). In addition, investigators have also developed protocols to assess auditory gating directly in the brain by using surface electrodes or, in animals, intracranial electrodes, and have found similar results (Adler et al, 1982;Boutros et al, 1991;Clementz et al, 1997;Connolly et al, 2003;Erwin et al, 1991;Freedman et al, 1996;Judd et al, 1992;Stevens et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[30][31][32] The P50 wave is generated in a conditioning-testing paradigm where the first stimulus activates or conditions the inhibition phenomenon, whereas the second tests its strength. Normally, individuals reduce the second (test) response relative to the first (condition) waves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results show that different brain structures are implicated in the reduction of the sensory gating ability studied by the P50 paradigm 5,8,10,15,16 . The sensory filter depends on complex brain circuits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The response to the first (conditioning) stimulus (S1) activates brain mechanisms that reduce the response to the second (test) stimulus (S2). The finding of a smaller ratio or a greater difference between stimuli indicates better inhibition or, in other words, a more effective gating of irrelevant stimuli [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] . Several studies have shown that the P50 evoked potential obtained using the paradigm of paired conditioning-test stimuli is a very effective method for the analysis of the functioning of the sensory filter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation