Larcher F., Berruti A., Gullino P., Scariot V., 2011. Reducing peat and growth regulator input in camellia pot cultivation. Hort. Sci. (Prague), 38: 35-42.Regulating plant development plays an important part in Camellia japonica L. pot production. Cultivation usually occurs on peat-based substrate and growth control is performed with triazoles application. However, there is an increasing need for suitable peat alternatives and more eff ective protocols. Th is study evaluated the eff ectiveness of three diff erent dosages (50, 100, 200 mg/l) and two application protocols (foliar spray, once or twice) of paclobutrazol on two C. japonica cultivars grown on eight diff erent substrate mixtures. Th e substrates were composed of four peat substitutes (local green compost, pumice, composted coconut peat, and pine bark) mixed with the standard substrate at 30-40% by volume. Treated plants showed reduction in most of the growth-related parameters, enhancement of ornamental value and an overall plant health improvement. Basically, one application of paclobutrazol 50 mg/l was suffi ciently active. Among substrates, pine bark appeared to be a suitable partial peat alternative. Considering their lower cost and eff ective performances, pumice and coconut peat proved suitable alternatives, too.Keywords: fl owering; plant development; paclobutrazol; ornamental plants; substrates Abbreviations: Ø -diameter; BDW -branches dry weight; cv -cultivar; DB -Dr. Burnside; FC* -flower chroma; Fh° -flower hue angle; FL* -flower lightness; FN -flower number; FV -flower conical volume; H -height; H/Ø -height-diameter ratio; LC* -leaf chroma; LDW -leaves dry weight; LG -leaf gloss; Lh° -leaf hue angle; LL* -leaf lightness; LN -leaves number; MR -mortality rate; NP -Nuccio's Pearl; PBZ -paclobutrazol; PGR -plant growth regulator; RC -root colour; RD -root density; RT -root thickness; SPAD -chlorophyll content; Sub -substrate Supported by the Regione Piemonte, Project No. 345/12-29.11.2004 Hort. Sci. (Prague) Vol. 38, 2011, No. 1: 35-42 Plant height and fl owering are two highly controversial features of greenhouse ornamental plant pot cultivation. Th e tendency to grow taller than desired and the absence of synchronized fl owering was shown to hinder the achievement of marketable ornamental plants (Banko, Landon 2005).Th ere are diff erent categories of control tools available to producers: biological, mechanical, environmental, and chemical. Biological control is the newest and the highest yield potential method, but still does not represent a reliable and universal technique (Bailey, Whipker 1998). Mechanical and environmental control relies on knowledge of how plant growth can be aff ected by cultural practices and environmental conditions. It includes many techniques like shoot brushing, impedance,