Inhibition by Ipsenol of Pine Engraver Attraction in Northern Idaho
1

Furniss, Malcolm M.; Livingston, R. Ladd

doi:10.1093/ee/8.2.369

Cited by 20 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Temnochila chlorodia, Enoclerus sphegeus, E. nigrifrons, Thanasimus undatulus, and T. dubius were all attracted to ipsdienol. These results are consistent with those of Vite and Gara (1962), Wood et al (1968), Furniss and Livingston (1979), Raffa and Klepzig (1989), Miller and Borden (1990), and Seybold et al (1992). Similar research has demonstrated that E. lecontei is also attracted to ipsdienol (Wood et al, 1968;Miller and Borden, 1990).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Geographic Variation in Response of Pine Engraver, Ips pini, and Associated Species to Pheromone, Lanierone

Miller¹,

Gibson

Raffa

et al. 1997

J Chem Ecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Lanierone strongly synergized the attraction of male and female Ips pini (Say) to ipsdienol in New York and Wisconsin. Synergy was only weakly significant in Montana and British Columbia and not significant in California. Catches of I. pini in ipsdienol-baited traps were increased 0% (i.e., nonsignificant) to 9942% by lanierone, with the highest increases in eastern North America. Lanierone had the least effect in California. The effects of lanierone on sex ratios of I. pini in trap catches varied significantly between regions. The addition of lanierone to ipsdienol-baited traps resulted in a general increase in male representation at nine of 12 sites. Ips integer (Eichhoff) was attracted to lanierone alone. Ipsdienol reduced the response of /. integer to lanierone. Enoclerus lecontei (Wolcott) (Cleridae) preferred traps baited with the combination of ipsdienol and lanierone. (R)-(-)-Ipsdienol was attractive to E. sphegeus (F.), Thanasimus undatulus (Say) (Cleridae), and Temnochila chlorodia (Mannerheim) (Trogositidae), while racemic ipsdienol was attractive to E. nigrifrons var. gerhardi Wolc. and Thanasimus dubius (F.). Lanierone had no effect on these species.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Geographic Variation in Response of Pine Engraver, Ips pini, and Associated Species to Pheromone, Lanierone

Miller¹,

Gibson

Raffa

et al. 1997

J Chem Ecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Such high variability may be a reflection of the rapid turnover of subcortical insect communities within the disturbed habitats, and the associated large volume of semiochemical signaling by numerous species present at any given time. For example, semiochemicals of some species of scolytid beetles may interfere with the behavioral responses of related and/or competing species (e.g., allomones) (Wood et al 1967;Birch and Wood 1975;Furniss and Livingston 1979;Borden et al 1992;Miller and Borden 1992). Other possible reasons for the variable responses include: 1) high population levels of dominant subcortical species at the time of sampling (see next paragraph); and 2) the effects of local physical factors such as forest structure and weather conditions, whose effects on responses to semiochemicals are less well understood (Thistle et al 2004).…”

Section: Effects Of Semiochemical Treatments On Subcortical Insectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of Semiochemicals to Assess the Biodiversity of Subcortical Insects following an Ecosystem Disturbance in a Sub-boreal Forest

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

From 2000 through 2003 we used semiochemicalbaited traps in northeastern Minnesota, USA, to assess changes in assemblages of subcortical forest insects after a catastrophic wind storm in 1999 and subsequent (1999)(2000) fuel-reduction activities (salvage-logging and prescribed-burning). We determined the regional efficacy of fifteen semiochemical blends (pheromones and kairomones) as attractants for target and non-target subcortical insect species (Coleoptera: Anthribidae, Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, Cleridae, Cucujidae, Curculionidae, Histeridae, Nemonychidae, Salpingidae, Scolytidae, Tenebrionidae, and Hymenoptera: Siricidae we trapped 86,471 subcortical insects (143 species) in baited and unbaited Lindgren funnel traps, and 500 beetles (44 species) in baited and unbaited pitfall traps. We report 23 new state collection records of subcortical insects from Minnesota. Trap catches of subcortical insects were greatest in the wind-disturbed areas 2 years after the event, and declined thereafter. Similar trends were observed for subcortical insects in the burned areas. Both wind-disturbance and burning increased the subcortical insect species richness and diversity on the landscape. The subcortical insect species compositions of the salvaged and burned forest areas differed from those of the undisturbed and wind-disturbed areas. Trap catches of subcortical insects in response to semiochemical treatments also varied with year of sampling and land-area treatment. The greatest diversity of subcortical beetle species was in traps baited with attractants for the scolytids, Dendroctonus valens [(+)-α-pinene and (−)-β-pinene] and Dryocoetes spp. [exo-brevicomin and (−)-α-pinene], perhaps reflecting the generic nature of the baits. The most distinct species compositions were collected in response to the woodborer and Dendroctonus simplex baits, whereas the species compositions in traps with the D. valens and Dryocoetes spp. baits, and the unbaited funnel trap were the most similar. The variation in trap catch with time and across landscapes suggests that the responses of subcortical insects to semiochemicals are more complex than previously appreciated.

show abstract

“…Interspecific chemical communication is ubiquitous in bark beetle communities Wood 1982a;Cane et al 1990;Smith et al 1990;Borden et al 1992;Savoie et al 1998), even though it is seldom reported in other taxa (London and Jeanne 1996;Chivers et al 1997). I. pini in the western United States is deterred by ipsenol (Furniss and Livingston 1979;Borden et al 1992), which is produced by sympatric populations of I. paraconfusus (Lanier), and I. paraconfusus are deterred by R-(-)-ipsdienol which is produced by sympatric populations of I. pini (Birch and Wood 1975). Similarly, the attraction of I. latidens to its pheromone, ipsenol, is inhibited by the ipsdienol produced by I. pini .…”

Section: Pheromone Communication Among Speciesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resource partitioning and overlap in three sympatric species of Ips bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)

Ayres

Abrahamson

et al. 2001

Oecologia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The bark beetles Ips pini, I. perroti, and I. grandicollis are sympatric in pine forests of the north-central United States. They share the same limited phloem resource and often coexist within the same host trees. We tested whether phloem resources are partitioned in time and space by measuring spatial and seasonal colonization of logs. Differences among species in flight phenology, development time, voltinism, and spatial colonization patterns within logs reduce, but do not eliminate, species overlap. The bark beetle species share predation by Thanasimus dubius (Cleridae) and Platysoma cylindrica (Histeridae), which exploit pheromone signals for prey location. We employed pheromone traps to test for chemical communication among bark beetle species. Heterospecific signals tend to be deterrents when they are added to conspecific signals but attractants when they are alone, indicating that the communication system can both reduce and increase species overlap in resource use depending upon relative abundance of the species. Deterrence by heterospecific signals is probably a result of selection for minimizing interspecific competition. However, individuals may sometimes benefit from joining aggregations of other species because of (1) predator swamping, (2) improved success in attacking live trees, and (3) location of suitable, recently dead, trees. These benefits should be greatest for males (which locate and colonize host trees before signalling females) and indeed males tended to be more attracted than females by heterospecific signals. Shared resources, shared predators, and heterospecific pheromone communication all contribute to species interactions in this guild of bark beetles, but predicting whether the removal of one species will tend to increase or decrease the abundance of remaining species remains difficult. Species interactions are likely conditional and coexistence is probably promoted by benefits to rare species of multispecies associations.

show abstract

Inhibition by Ipsenol of Pine Engraver Attraction in Northern Idaho 1

Cited by 20 publications

References 0 publications

Geographic Variation in Response of Pine Engraver, Ips pini, and Associated Species to Pheromone, Lanierone

Geographic Variation in Response of Pine Engraver, Ips pini, and Associated Species to Pheromone, Lanierone

Application of Semiochemicals to Assess the Biodiversity of Subcortical Insects following an Ecosystem Disturbance in a Sub-boreal Forest

Resource partitioning and overlap in three sympatric species of Ips bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About