Inhibin may be involved in negative feedback in the prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus)

Abstract

The changes in inhibin immunostaining in the gonads during the annual reproductive cycle of both sexes of the prairie dog are described. No inhibin immunostaining was found in primary or secondary follicles of the ovary. Theca and granulosa cells of preovulatory Graafian follicles found in January and February stained for inhibin. Corpora lutea of both pregnant and non-pregnant females stain more densely for inhibin than follicles. Inhibin staining is present in luteal cells for at least 4 months during regression, longer than detectable progesterone is secreted. Sertoli cells in the testes do not have inhibin immunostaining during recrudescence. These cells show light immunostain for inhibin during peak spermatogenic activity in January and February but stain more deeply during early regression of the testis. Stain is gradually lost in the next 4-5 months as the tubules close. Leydig cells and germ cells do not stain for inhibin at any stage of the annual cycle but interstitial cells and tunic cells stain during the breeding phase. The presence of immunochemical staining for inhibin in prairie dog gonads during regression suggests that inhibin is part of a negative feedback complex that includes progesterone in the female and testosterone or another androgen in the male. Negative feedback during regression may also cause gonadal inactivity.

Inhibin‐α Immunohistochemical Expression in Mature and Immature Canine Sertoli and Leydig Cells

“…Inhibin (INH) is a dimeric glycoprotein hormone conserved among species (Foreman 2007) and synthesized in male mammals by both Sertoli cells (SCs) and Leydig cells (LCs) (Maddoks and Sharpe 1989;Hayes et al 1998). Inhibin is composed of an a-subunit and one or two possible b-subunits, b A or b B (Kommoss et al 2000).…”

“…Inhibin (INH) is a dimeric glycoprotein hormone conserved among species (Foreman 2007) and synthesized in male mammals by both Sertoli cells (SCs) and Leydig cells (LCs) (Maddoks and Sharpe 1989; Hayes et al. 1998).…”