Inheritance of resistance to podfly and podborer in the interspecific cross of pigeonpea

Verulkar, S. B.; Singh, D. P.; Bhattacharya, A. K.

doi:10.1007/s001220050590

Cited by 22 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In F3 generation, the segregation pattern of 78 F3 families for plume moth reaction was good fit for 1 (18 non segregating resistant): 2 (46 segregating): 1 (14 non segregating susceptible) ratio (χ 2 = 2.923, p-value = 0.403), evidencing monogenic segregation pattern and single dominant gene action, as reported for pod borer resistance (Verulkar et al, 1997;Aruna et al, 2005;Mishra et al, 2013) and Fusarium wilt resistance (Kotresh et al, 2006) in pigeon-pea. This monogenic segregation for plume moth resistance was further established by 1:1 segregation pattern at BC1F1 (χ 2 = 0.332, p-value = 0.564) lines.…”

Section: Inheritance Of Plume Moth Resistancesupporting

confidence: 63%

“…It has also been reported that low densities of glandular long and high density of non-glandular short trichomes were associated with the host resistance caused by H. armigera (Aruna et al, 2005). Similarly, resistance to M. obtusa (Pod fly) was governed by two recessive genes with complementary gene action (Verulkar et al, 1997). Further, Sharma et al (2003) reported a negative association between pod wasp (Tanaostigmodes cajaninae) and pod borer.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Maesen possessed with host resistance to pod borer (H. armigera) and some of its allied pests including pod fly, blue butterfly and plume moth (Sujana et al, 2008;Panigrahi, 2011). Hence, the genetic control of resistance to these pests have been identified in pigeon-pea using interspecific populations involving accessions of C. cajan and C. scarabaeoides (Verulkar et al, 1997;Aruna et al, 2005;Mishra et al, 2013;Sahu et al, 2015). All earlier workers reported that, resistance to pod borer (caused by H. armigera) is controlled by dominant allele of a single gene.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Development of dominant sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) marker linked with plume moth (Exelastis atomosa Walsingham 1886) resistance in pigeon-pea

Mishra

Nag

Panigrahi

2015

Chilean J. Agric. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The mode of gene action governing resistance to plume moth (Exelastis atomosa Walsingham 1886) derived from pigeonpea (Cajanus scarabaeoides (L.) Thouars) accession ICPW-94 has been determined and the resistance alleles have been designated as PPM1. The progenies of F2 population and F3 families derived from an interspecific cross C. cajan (L.) Huth ('ICP-26') × C. scarabaeoides (accession ICPW-94) revealed monogenic gene action for resistance to plume moth, and the dominant control by single locus or cluster of tightly linked alleles. Bulked segregant analysis (BSA) of 116 F2 progenies by using 143 parental polymorphic RAPD primers could identify a fragment OPA09910 associated with plume moth resistance in coupling phase of linkage. Further single plant analysis of the 116 F2 mapping population revealed OPA09910 was linked to PPM1 locus conferring host resistance to plume moth with recombination fraction (rf) value of 0.125 (12.7 cM of Kosambi function). The resistance specific fragment OPA09910 was cloned, sequenced and converted into a sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) marker, SCOPA09942, which was also closely associated (10.3 cM) with the locus PPM1 with rf value 0.102. BLAST analysis with pigeon-pea genome sequence also confirmed its occurrence in CcLG02 (Scafseq.LG_V5.0fa) and contig 01597 (AFSP01.fsa1). This SCAR marker showed reasonable screening efficiency in the F2, F3, and BC1F1 lines, thus it can be used as genetic handle in marker-assisted introgression of the genomic fragment conferring plume moth resistance and screening of breeding lines in pigeon-pea.

show abstract

Section: Inheritance Of Plume Moth Resistancesupporting

confidence: 63%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Development of dominant sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) marker linked with plume moth (Exelastis atomosa Walsingham 1886) resistance in pigeon-pea

Mishra

Nag

Panigrahi

2015

Chilean J. Agric. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Verulkar et al [58] reported from their study comprising F 1 (derived from a cross between a cultivated type "Pant A-3" and a wild accession "JM 4147" from C. scarabaeoides), F 2 , and backcross generations that the resistance (antixenosis) to pod borer is governed by a single dominant gene ( Table 3). Genetics of trichome features has been studied in some detail by [37].…”

Section: Genetics Of Resistancementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The wild species have antixenosis, antibiosis and nonpreferential oviposition among the various mechanisms of resistance to pod borer [28]. An accession "JM 4147" of the wild species C. scarabaeoides has been reported to possess resistance to both pod fly and the pod borer [58]. The mechanism involved for resistance was suggested as antixenosis.…”

Section: Mechanism Of Resistancementioning

confidence: 99%

Conventional and Molecular Approaches towards Genetic Improvement in Pigeonpea for Insects Resistance

Choudhary¹,

Raje²,

Datta³

et al. 2013

AJPS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh] is an important food legume of the semi-arid tropics (SAT) sustaining livelihood of millions of people. Stagnant and unstable yield per hectare all over the world is the characteristic feature of this crop. This is primarily ascribed to its susceptibility/sensitivity to a number of biotic and abiotic factors. Among biotic factors, insects such as pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera), pod fly (Melanoagromyza obtusa) and spotted borer (Maruca vitrata) substantially damage the crop and result in significant economic losses. Management of these insects by genetic means has always been considered environment friendly approach. However, genetic improvement has always been impeded by limited genetic variability in the primary gene pool of pigeonpea. Wild species present in the secondary and tertiary gene pools have been reported to carry resistance for such insects. However, transfer of resistance through conventional backcrossing has not been much successful. It calls for gene introgression through marker assisted backcrossing (MABC) or advanced backcross breeding (AB breeding). In this review, we have attempted to assess the progress made through conventional and molecular breeding and suggested the ways to move further towards genetic enhancement for insects resistance in pigeonpea.

show abstract

Using Genomics to Exploit Grain Legume Biodiversity in Crop Improvement

Dwivedi¹,

Upadhyaya²,

Jayashree³

et al. 2005

Plant Breeding Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Inheritance of resistance to podfly and podborer in the interspecific cross of pigeonpea

Cited by 22 publications

References 0 publications

Development of dominant sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) marker linked with plume moth (Exelastis atomosa Walsingham 1886) resistance in pigeon-pea

Development of dominant sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) marker linked with plume moth (Exelastis atomosa Walsingham 1886) resistance in pigeon-pea

Conventional and Molecular Approaches towards Genetic Improvement in Pigeonpea for Insects Resistance

Using Genomics to Exploit Grain Legume Biodiversity in Crop Improvement

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About