2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhabiting the impasse: Social exclusion through visible assemblage in neighborhood gentrification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although sometimes depicted as mired in endless debates about supply- versus demand-side explanations of land revaluation (Cartier, 2017), gentrification studies are arguably overcoming this intellectual impasse by embracing assemblage theories and exploring the role of the non-human in enhancing the affective and aesthetic qualities that add value to property (e.g. De Haan, 2018; Linz, 2017; Kern, 2015). One notable tradition here has been the identification of green or eco-gentrification, whereby environmental remediation and green place-making, either inadvertently or otherwise, creates enclaves of environmental privilege excluding lower income residents (Quastel, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although sometimes depicted as mired in endless debates about supply- versus demand-side explanations of land revaluation (Cartier, 2017), gentrification studies are arguably overcoming this intellectual impasse by embracing assemblage theories and exploring the role of the non-human in enhancing the affective and aesthetic qualities that add value to property (e.g. De Haan, 2018; Linz, 2017; Kern, 2015). One notable tradition here has been the identification of green or eco-gentrification, whereby environmental remediation and green place-making, either inadvertently or otherwise, creates enclaves of environmental privilege excluding lower income residents (Quastel, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The articles dealing with the impacts of gentrification and regeneration on the local community within a single neighbourhood (Butcher, 2019;Butcher & Dickens, 2016;Linz, 2017;Paiva & Sánchez-Fuarros, 2021;Yarker, 2018) are complemented by: a more focused, comparative study of two cafes within a gentrifying neighbourhood (Kuruoğlu & Woodward, 2021); an analysis of atmospheric engineering performed by the architecture of commercial spaces (Kindynis, 2021); a study of atmospheres emerging in a neighbourhood under intensive construction (Marotta & Cummings, 2019); a study of the impacts of a city's metropolitan area expansion on a neighbourhood (Paiva, 2016); a study of the impacts of introducing private security policing in a crime-ridden neighbourhood (Mosselson, 2019). Additionally, I have decided to include a theoretical article (Andrews & Duff, 2020) which accurately complements the selected empirical studies by more explicitly emphasising the connection between spatial, territorialised atmospheric production and broader, non-material socioeconomic processes.…”
Section: Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Linz 51 and Addie & Fraser 52 have used Lauren Berlant's work -which is central to my analysis below -to think through place transformation; incidentally, both focus on Cincinnati's Over-the-Rhine (OTR) neighborhood. Addie and Fraser use Berlant's work to pose some critical questions about academic studies of gentrification and the tools brought to bear in doing so.…”
Section: Makers Gentrification and The (Urban) Impassementioning
confidence: 99%