Participants in the U.S. maker movement generate market-worthy consumer goods from the bare bones of novel ideas and simple production equipment. For cities and policymakers, making thus represents the opportunity to develop new manufacturing industries and employment. For makers to transform themselves into large-volume producers, however, they must negotiate significant financing, production and distribution barriers without recourse to the capabilities of the large manufacturing firm. Drawing on 137 interviews with makers and maker-supporting organizations, we call attention to the challenges of “manufacturing without the firm,” as well as the extent to which the localized institutional ecosystems in which makers are embedded may help them circumvent these challenges. Our findings indicate that the maker movement's generative prospects rest on these firms' ability to negotiate problems of production and markets that have beset clusters of small firms for many decades.
This article addresses the deficit between affect theory and planning scholarship. In doing so, we focus on three intertwined theoretical ideas, all of which underlie the practical experiences of navigating place change. First, we consider the desire of power to control that which overwhelms the body’s capacity for being affected. Second, we situate the confrontation between power and uncertainty (e.g. over a place’s future) in the milieu or atmosphere of a place. Third, we put place theory into conversation with Lauren Berlant’s concept of “impasse” to examine place attachments during the flux of rapid redevelopment. To animate these theoretical ideas, the latter portion of the article discusses the nearly complete redevelopment of a subsection of Portland’s (OR, USA) Pearl District neighborhood and the “images of the future” that adorn almost every local construction site. Relying on the work of Deleuze and Berlant among others, we address these images as mediations of power, on the grounds of the affects that elude control, and in the context of resident anxieties about uncertain futures and fraying place attachments. Throughout the article we locate planning in the same “between” spaces that affective analyses so adeptly identify. We argue that this positions planning scholarship as a natural forum for exploring the affective infrastructures that enliven the relationships between people and places.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.