Infrastructure, wildlife tourism, (il)legible populations: A comparative study of two districts in contemporary Botswana

Abstract

This article interrogates how the provision (or absence) of state infrastructure such as roads, bridges, permanent buildings, water reticulation, electricity, and transport facilities in regions hosting the lucrative tourism industry is linked to state control and regulation of the use of space, as well as the daily lives of conservation-adjacent citizens. Using the dialectic of legibility and illegibility in the context of Botswana’s expansive wildlife tourism industry, it examines how ambiguous government expansions and retractions of infrastructure function as mechanisms of state-building in relation to the natural environment. In Botswana’s western region, the provision of infrastructure draws out previously sparsely populated and seasonally mobile people from “the bush” to live in state-sanctioned villages, pulling them into a relationship of “legibility” with the state. However, in the north, where the bulk of the tourism industry is based, the calculus is different. The allocation of infrastructure is delayed or denied in order to maintain the fiction of a people-free wilderness that appeals to foreign tourist consumers—pushing local people into “illegibility”. The myth of a people-less wilderness produces highly differentiated modes of state intervention in rural areas, shifting local peoples’ ability to interface with the state, the tourism industry, and other citizens. This article conceptualizes illegibility not as a form of resistance to, or avoidance of, state power but in the unique context produced by enclave wildlife tourism, an alternative manifestation of state power.

Exploring the relationships between heritage tourism, sustainable community development and host communities’ health and wellbeing: A systematic review

“…Such a multi-livelihood framework would also promote the accessibility of benefits for more of the community, and this poses a significant new direction for tourism research. For example, an outcome of the review was the observation that infrastructure development is often directed towards privileged tourism livelihood options [ 150 ], but a more holistic framework would distribute these sorts of benefits to also co-develop other livelihoods.…”

Imagining Advancement of Wilding Educational Policy: Reflections and Possibilities in Botswana

“…Thirty-nine percent of Botswana’s territory consists of protected areas; thus, Botswana exhibits an exceptional level of conservation (Barnes, 2001). Protected areas include Moremi Game Reserve, Chobe National Park, Nxai Pan National Park, Makgadikgadi Pans National Park and Central Kalahari Game Reserve (Magole, 2009; Taylor, 2000; LaRocco, 2019; Bolaane, 2013). Areas in the north have larger wildlife populations.…”

The violence of involuntary resettlement and emerging resistance in Mozambique's Limpopo National Park: The role of physical and social infrastructure

“…The two infrastructure examples show that, once provided, they can cause symbolic violence (Bourdieu, 1989) through which people are forced to accept new roles as citizens who purchase water services and are expected to invest in new forms of cash-earning livelihoods (LaRocco, 2020). Infrastructure thus works to generate ‘cruel optimism’ by which resettled people as new citizens retain ‘affective attachment to what we call “the good life”’ while enduring ‘a bad life’ that wears them out because they find ‘their conditions of possibility within it’ (Berlant, 2011: 27).…”