Infrastructure Support for the Innovative Transformation of Business Structures in the Digital Economy

Golubetskaya, N. P.; Kurlov, A. V.

doi:10.35854/1998-1627-2020-11-1210-1216

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Second, we should integrate the "new infrastructure" to consolidate the smart transformation of power grids, water networks and transport networks to create a national strategy for fast-moving ubiquitous security. Third, we should use new infrastructures to unify industry databases to enhance the high penetration of productive and digital goods, changing the main role of solution providers in the integrated service system of enterprises and driving innovation in productive services [20].…”

Section: Tapping Into the Role Of Market Mechanisms To Promote A New ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Financial Support for High-quality Development in the Context of Digital Economy

Bai¹

2023

BCPBM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As a new form of business of international concern and a new force to promote the world economy, the digital economy is considered by many countries as a difficult choice to promote economic growth and improve business structure, and also provide new opportunities and new ways for China's economic development and construction of technical infrastructure business today. Economic development is the most important of the real economy, and the development of a good economic system is very important to integrate China's economic base. The financial market is considered as another important force to support the positive development of the manufacturing industry after the concept of "Internet plus", because the resources can be distributed the contents. Recently, the financial industry has been considered as a good development of business development. In research, the paper analyzes the current situation and the problems of the integration of finance and production in the background of the digital economy, and proposes solutions. better to direct resources to production.

show abstract

Section: Tapping Into the Role Of Market Mechanisms To Promote A New ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Financial Support for High-quality Development in the Context of Digital Economy

Bai¹

2023

BCPBM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This indicator serves to identify the presence of a specialized organizational unit or professional team equipped with analytical skills, sufficient resources, and appropriate levels of organizational support. By offering comprehension into the capacity of public organizations to acquire, handle, and employ data and evidence from various sources, this indicator facilitates an understanding of the extent to which a team of skilled professionals, legitimized across organizational hierarchies, can contribute to this effort (Golubetskaya and Kurlov 2021;Picciotto 2020). Due to the role related to specialized data analysis and management units in terms of knowledge sharing and promotion and supervision activities, this indicator informs about coordinated autonomy strategies of local government for robust governance.…”

Section: Economic Resource Allocation: Budget Linked To Contingency P...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Local Governments Facing Turbulence: Robust Governance and Institutional Capacities

Salvador,

Sancho

2023

Social Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Crisis environments, which are becoming systemic, pose significant challenges to local governments. The present study sought to present an academic contribution by introducing an analytical framework designed to scrutinize the institutional capabilities of local governance bodies in effectively responding to the emergent structural nature of crises within contemporary contexts. The study centered its attention on the concept of robust governance and accentuated a collection of factors that facilitate proficient public administration: contingency planning capacity, analytical capacity, organizational management capacity, and collaborative capacity. The paper presented a broad analysis of academic literature on the subject and it defined an analytical model for assessing local government capacities to deal with crises. One of the achievements of this work was the identification of key indicators that elucidate the institutional capabilities of local government bodies in addressing crisis environments. Through the examination of these indicators, the suggested analytical framework offers a comprehensive methodology for evaluating the readiness of municipal authorities in dealing with crisis situations. Furthermore, it enables comparative analysis of local government systems in analogous contexts, facilitating the identification of exemplary strategies for enhancing crisis management. The analytical model needs to be validated in further empirical studies.

show abstract

“…This indicator serves to identify the presence of a specialized organizational unit or professional team equipped with analytical skills, sufficient resources, and appropriate levels of organizational support. By providing insight into the ability of public organizations to access, manage, and apply data and evidence of diverse origins to bolster decisionmaking processes, this indicator facilitates an understanding of the extent to which a team of skilled professionals, legitimized across organizational hierarchies, can contribute to this effort [58,59]. Due to the role related to specialized data analysis and management units in terms of knowledge sharing and promotion and supervision activities, this indicator informs about coordinated autonomy strategies of smart government for robust governance.…”

Section: Policy Makers Trained In Risk Management: Existence Of Polic...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Smart Local Governments Facing Turbulence: Robust Governance and Institutional Capacities

Serna¹,

Sancho²

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Crisis environments, which are becoming systemic, pose significant challenges to smart government strategies. The paper aims to contribute to academic debate by proposing an analytical framework for examining the institutional capacities of smart government systems in addressing local crises. The paper focuses on the recent approach of robust governance and highlights a set of variables that promote effective smart government: contingency planning capacity, analytical capacity, organizational management capacity, and collaborative capacity. The study presents an analytical model for evaluating the robustness and effectiveness of local smart government systems in crises. One of the significant findings of this study has been the identification of critical indicators that inform institutional capacities of smart government systems. By analyzing these indicators, the proposed analytical framework provides a comprehensive approach to assess the preparedness of smart government systems in dealing with crises. Moreover, it can be used to benchmark the performance of local smart government systems in similar contexts and identify best practices for improving crisis management.

show abstract

Infrastructure Support for the Innovative Transformation of Business Structures in the Digital Economy

Cited by 6 publications

References 2 publications

Financial Support for High-quality Development in the Context of Digital Economy

Financial Support for High-quality Development in the Context of Digital Economy

Local Governments Facing Turbulence: Robust Governance and Institutional Capacities

Smart Local Governments Facing Turbulence: Robust Governance and Institutional Capacities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About