2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2003.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infrastructure quality in deregulated industries: is there an underinvestment problem?

Abstract: We investigate how various institutional settings affect a network provider's incentives to invest in infrastructure quality. Under reasonable assumptions on demand, investment incentives turn out to be smaller under vertical separation than under vertical integration, though we also provide counterexamples. The introduction of downstream competition for the market can sometimes improve incentives. With suitable non-linear access prices investment incentives under separation become identical to those under int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sidak and Spulber (1997) emphasise the significance of the regulator's commitment problem in a dynamic setting. Buehler et al (2004) examine the effects of several different institutional settings on a network owner's investment incentives, but they do not consider the case of an integrated network owner competing with independent downstream rivals. Cambini and Valletti (2003) study competing network operators' incentives to invest in facilities with different levels of quality Numerous authors have considered the question of how investment spillovers affect private incentives to perform R&D. These studies date back to Arrow (1962) and the issue has later been examined among others by Spence (1984), D'Aspremont andJacquemin (1988) and Kamien, Muller and Zang (1992).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sidak and Spulber (1997) emphasise the significance of the regulator's commitment problem in a dynamic setting. Buehler et al (2004) examine the effects of several different institutional settings on a network owner's investment incentives, but they do not consider the case of an integrated network owner competing with independent downstream rivals. Cambini and Valletti (2003) study competing network operators' incentives to invest in facilities with different levels of quality Numerous authors have considered the question of how investment spillovers affect private incentives to perform R&D. These studies date back to Arrow (1962) and the issue has later been examined among others by Spence (1984), D'Aspremont andJacquemin (1988) and Kamien, Muller and Zang (1992).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect is e.g. investigated analytically by Bühler et al (2004). Partly this is due to a change in utilities' asset management strategies with the aim of reducing total maintenance costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the British reform, both issues were hotly debated (see, e.g. Bühler et al 2004). 4 Officially, the law is known as Gesetz zur Regionalisierung des öffentlichen Personennahverkehrs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%