2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2010.04.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infrared spectroscopic detection of the methylgermyl (H2GeCH3) radical and its perdeuterated counterpart in low temperature matrices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy difference between i1 and i2 and of p1 and p2 of 35 and 18 kJ mol −1 agree nicely with an earlier computational study by Osamura et al. (39 and 10 kJ mol −1 ) [18a, 22] . The computations also revealed reaction pathways to the thermodynamically less stable isomers methylsilylene (HSiCH 3 ; p2 ; X 1 A′) and silylmethylene (HCSiH 3 ; p3 ; X 3 A′′) via exit barrierless decomposition of i2 and i1 , respectively.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The energy difference between i1 and i2 and of p1 and p2 of 35 and 18 kJ mol −1 agree nicely with an earlier computational study by Osamura et al. (39 and 10 kJ mol −1 ) [18a, 22] . The computations also revealed reaction pathways to the thermodynamically less stable isomers methylsilylene (HSiCH 3 ; p2 ; X 1 A′) and silylmethylene (HCSiH 3 ; p3 ; X 3 A′′) via exit barrierless decomposition of i2 and i1 , respectively.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The methylgermyl radical represents the global minimum of the GeCH 5 PES. The energy difference between i1 and i2 of 72 kJ mol À 1 along with the barrier to isomerization of 151 kJ mol À 1 correlate nicely with earlier computational studies by Osamura et al (60-69 kJ mol À 1 ) [17] and Kudo and Nagase (151-160 kJ mol À 1 ). [22] The methylgermyl radical (GeH 2 CH 3 ; X 2 A'; i2) was found to undergo unimolecular decomposition via atomic hydrogen loss from the GeH 2 moiety via a lose exit transition state leading to the experimentally observed singlet methylgermylene (HGeCH 3 ; X 1 A'; p1) product.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Gas-phase kinetics of the reactions of germylenes have been studied [15] and methylgermylene (HGeCH 3 ; 8; X 1 A') was first tentatively characterized via laser flash photolysis of 1,3,4-trimethylgermacyclopent-3-ene; the UV spectrum and rate constants of its reactions with 10 different substrates were measured. [16] In 2010, HGeCH 3 was inferred from matrix isolation studies [17] via the ν 3 and ν 5 modes at 1803 and 1230 cm À 1 . Electronic structure calculations predicted the existence of three structural isomers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter undergoes rapid intersystem crossing to the singlet manifold and singlet germylmethylene (HCGeH 3 ; X 1 A), which then isomerizes nearly instantaneously through a hydrogen shift to germylene (H 2 CGeH 2 ; X 1 A 1 ) followed by either decomposition via molecular hydrogen loss to afford 1-germavinylidene (H 2 CGe; X 1 A 1 ) or another hydrogen shift to afford methylgermylene (CH 3 GeH; X 1 A′) prior to unimolecular decomposition to 1-germavinylidene (H 2 CGe; X 1 A 1 ). The preparation of the unstable molecules with multiple bonds has been studied utilizing various methods, including laser flash photolysis, 35 matrix isolation, 32 electric discharge, 22 and vacuum gas−solid reactions. 36 However, directed gas-phase preparation of extremely unstable molecules and determination of the corresponding angular distribution and translational energy information without consecutive collisions and wall effects are still needed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sequence of stability agrees well with previous calculations. 19,32 How can these products be formed? The calculations reveal that the reaction of ground state atomic carbon ( 3 P) with germane (X 1 A 1 ) is initiated on the triplet surface via barrierless insertion of carbon into one of the four germanium−hydrogen bonds forming triplet germylmethylene (HCGeH 3 ; a 3 A; 3 i1) residing 322 kJ mol −1 below the separated reactants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%