2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2017.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infrared small-dim target detection based on Markov random field guided noise modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large number of methods have been developed to address the issues of small target detection. ese methods can be roughly classified into two categories: single-frame detection [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] and sequential multiframe detection [17][18][19]. Recently, Gao et al [17] employed the mixture of the Gaussians model [20] with the Markov random field to model the complex noise of which the target is assumed as a component.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of methods have been developed to address the issues of small target detection. ese methods can be roughly classified into two categories: single-frame detection [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] and sequential multiframe detection [17][18][19]. Recently, Gao et al [17] employed the mixture of the Gaussians model [20] with the Markov random field to model the complex noise of which the target is assumed as a component.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many approaches have been reported for addressing these issues, which roughly include two classes of mainstream detection methods: sequential detection [5,6] and single-frame detection [7,8]. Traditional sequential detection methods are driven by prior information such as target trajectory, velocity and shape, and essentially utilize the adjacent inter-frame knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Representative multiple targets images from the datasets and the separated target images obtained by six low-rank recovery-based methods (5)(6)(7)(8). are four representative multiple targets images from the tested datasets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, a state-of-the-art method [32] digs out valuable information in time domain and uses a mixture of Gaussian (MoG) noise models [33] to model the target component and noise component together. The MoG model characterizes each pixel in the image and updates the mixed Gaussian model after the new image is acquired.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the noise distribution in different frames is modeled as i.i.d. MoG distributions substantially in [32], which is not suitable for complex noisy scenarios. In addition, the MRF model does not provide a robust noise estimate in complex scenarios, since its performance is based on the assumption that the noise component does not arise in the neighborhood region of the targets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%