2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00449.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infrared reflectance as an alternative to EMG for measuring prepulse inhibition of startle eyeblink

Abstract: The "gold standard" measure of the human startle eyeblink response is the ocular electromyogram (EMG). However, EMG measurement is not always feasible, as with special populations or during functional neuroimaging. We evaluated an alternative, nonelectrical, noncontact measure that uses infrared (IR) light reflected from the eye. By simultaneously recording IR and EMG during an acoustic prepulse inhibition of startle paradigm, we were able to directly compare the two measures and evaluate the relative reliabil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is interesting, since video-measured eye lid movements shows a high correlation with the EMG [52] and startle evoked eye lid closure was susceptible to other experimental manipulations, such as affective startle modulation [53] or prepulse inhibition [54]. We also controlled for the probability of complete blinks (when the eyeball is fully covered by the lid), since these cases can diminish the correlation between lid movement and EMG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is interesting, since video-measured eye lid movements shows a high correlation with the EMG [52] and startle evoked eye lid closure was susceptible to other experimental manipulations, such as affective startle modulation [53] or prepulse inhibition [54]. We also controlled for the probability of complete blinks (when the eyeball is fully covered by the lid), since these cases can diminish the correlation between lid movement and EMG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amplitude is calculated as the difference from the onset (first inflection) to the peak (highest point) of the response indicating the strength of contraction. This technique has been compared with the more common use of electromyography (EMG) methods and shows adequate sensitivity for detecting the response (see Lovelace, Elmore, & Filion, ). The use of the photocell as opposed to EMG methods during exercise should reduce interference of (a) nonstartle‐related facial movements induced by challenging exercise intensities, and (b) potential effects of the muscle tension, heat, sweat, etc., that could influence electrodes on the skin.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, infants are usually fearful of objects being affixed to their face, particularly near the eye (Balaban & Berg, 2007). For these reasons, other measurement methods, such as the infrared reflectance (Lovelace, Elmore, & Filion, 2006) or a multiple muscle measurement (Bakker et al, 2009), have been proposed from different authors to measure startle in childhood (Balaban & Berg, 2007). However, alternative methodologies were never tested in the measuring of startle response during early infancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%