2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.08.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infrared and visible image fusion based on target-enhanced multiscale transform decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
90
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 279 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many fusion methods have been proposed for this purpose. The methods most commonly used for image fusion are multi-scale transforms [4] [44] and representation learning based methods [19] [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many fusion methods have been proposed for this purpose. The methods most commonly used for image fusion are multi-scale transforms [4] [44] and representation learning based methods [19] [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test data path is "/IV images/". For more results on additional test data (new test data containing 20 pairs of images), please refer to supplementary materials3 The deep features were extracted by 'Conv5' 4. The fusion strategy is 'addition' and λ = 1e2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first group of simulation tests, we used the presented method to fuse five typical infrared and visible images in the TNO datasets, namely, "Men in front of house," "Bunker," "Sandpath," "Kaptein_1123," and "barbed_wire_2". In addition, six MGAbased methods are selected for comparison experiments, including WT [23], TEMST [35], NSST with weighted average [36], NSST with WT [37], NSCT with WT [38], and CURV with WT [39].…”
Section: Comparison With Mga-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MGA-based methods are selected for comparison experiments, including WT [24] , TEMST [36] , NSST with weighted average [37] , NSST with WT [38] , NSCT with WT [39] and CURV with WT [40] .…”
Section: Comparison With Mga-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%