2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2795-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Informetrics of Scientometrics abstracts: a rhetorical move analysis of the research abstracts published in Scientometrics journal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discussion of Methods and Results in a scientifi c RA abstract is crucial. This fi nding supports Rashidi and Meihami's (2018) was framed by Hyland's (2000) fi ve-move model. The researchers found that the Method and Results sections contained most of the information in RA abstracts.…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The discussion of Methods and Results in a scientifi c RA abstract is crucial. This fi nding supports Rashidi and Meihami's (2018) was framed by Hyland's (2000) fi ve-move model. The researchers found that the Method and Results sections contained most of the information in RA abstracts.…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…Conversely, the move that provided the least information (i.e. used the least text space) in the present study was the Introduction, while it was the Conclusion in Rashidi and Meihami's (2018) study of RA abstracts in the Scientometrics Journal. This refl ects disciplinary-specifi c variations in move length.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…They analyzed three hundred RA abstracts during two different time intervals; 1998 -2007 and 2008 -2015, mentioned inclination to use 'Five move model' (Introduction, Purpose, Method, Product, Conclusion). Likewise, Meihami and Rashidi (2018) who analyzed four thousand two hundred and fourteen RA abstracts in four different time intervals; 1978 -1987, 1988 -1997, 1998 -2007 and 2008 -2017, also indicated the increase of implementing 'Five move model' in RA abstract.…”
Section: Tendency Of Rhetorical Move Usagementioning
confidence: 92%
“…This practice (Wenger, 1998) occurred from time to time up to this moment. As Meihami and Rashidi (2018) who did research across disciplines within different time intervals, addressed some reasons which affected choices such as dynamic situational options, community of practice (Wenger, 1998) and the extent of clarity of information.…”
Section: Tendency Of Rhetorical Move Usagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a known secret that Swales’s move analysis was pedagogical in its origin, motivated to booster academic literacy proficiency of the advanced-level nonnative English-speaking students (Rashidi & Meihami, 2018). In other words, it was not built upon the then-current theories, including cognitive linguistics (e.g., Croft & Cruse, 2004), functional linguistics (e.g., Luelsdorff, 1994), discursive psychology (e.g., Davies & Harré, 1990), or information structure theory (e.g., Kruijff-Korbayová & Steedman, 2003).…”
Section: Methodology and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%