2010
DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-s2-p32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Informed decision making before changing to RDT: a comparison of microscopy, Rapid Diagnostic Test and molecular techniques for the Diagnosis and Identification of Malaria Parasites in Kassala Eastern Sudan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When RDTs were used as the reference standard, nPCR exhibited sensitivity and positive values of 100% and 39.38% respectively. This ability for PCR to more accurately detect low-grade parasitemia with a higher degree of sensitivity than microscopy and RDTs supports the reports by other researchers [22], [27][28][29][30]. The high false negative obtained using RDTs has been reported and suggested that all RDT negative results be confirmed by microscopic analysis [31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…When RDTs were used as the reference standard, nPCR exhibited sensitivity and positive values of 100% and 39.38% respectively. This ability for PCR to more accurately detect low-grade parasitemia with a higher degree of sensitivity than microscopy and RDTs supports the reports by other researchers [22], [27][28][29][30]. The high false negative obtained using RDTs has been reported and suggested that all RDT negative results be confirmed by microscopic analysis [31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These two hospitals are tertiary hospitals that provide services for all patients referred from heath centers and rural hospitals. The area is characterized by unstable malaria transmission [11]. The detail of the method and clinical part of the study was published recently [12].…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RDTs have been recommended by the WHO as a convenient visual way of diagnosing malaria [17]. A study in Sudan by Osman et al, [18] showed that the RDTs they used produced a relatively high number of false positive samples. The RDT was compared to PCR and an agreement of only 81.2 and k = 0.48 (sensitivity 69%, speci city 84%) was reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%