Good Statistical Practice for Natural Resources Research 2004
DOI: 10.1079/9780851997223.0337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Informative presentation of tables, graphs and statistics.

Abstract: This chapter describes ways in which numerical information can be effectively transmitted in project reports and scientific papers. It further focuses on points most relevant to those presenting structured research results to an informed audience, reinforcing and complementing an authoritative source of guidance for the presentation of general statistical information, recommended by the authors (Plain Figures by Chapman and Wykes, 2nd Edition, 1996). Guidelines for the layout of graphs, charts and tables and f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe that the frequencies of the polymorphism genotypes should have been reported for the response groups instead of the polymorphisms genotypes that were reported throughout the article. As a result, the presentation of the frequencies of the polymorphism genotypes in Table 2 would be preferable in vertical order instead of in horizontal order 2 . Additionally, the protective genotype frequencies in the sustained virological response group, which were presented in the abstract, should be considered in the following manner: 44.2% rs4969170 G/G; 17.3% rs2853744 T/T; 69.2% rs11730582 T/T; 76.9% rs2071430 G/T; and 45.5% rs12979860 C/C.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that the frequencies of the polymorphism genotypes should have been reported for the response groups instead of the polymorphisms genotypes that were reported throughout the article. As a result, the presentation of the frequencies of the polymorphism genotypes in Table 2 would be preferable in vertical order instead of in horizontal order 2 . Additionally, the protective genotype frequencies in the sustained virological response group, which were presented in the abstract, should be considered in the following manner: 44.2% rs4969170 G/G; 17.3% rs2853744 T/T; 69.2% rs11730582 T/T; 76.9% rs2071430 G/T; and 45.5% rs12979860 C/C.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%