2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information systems projects’ success in government units: the issue of information systems integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this hierarchical structure model, there is a centralized and closed unified scheduler, which centralizes all the emergency information resources in the whole region and then hands them over to the main program, while the regional management information resources and organizational coordination information are passed through another independent is done by the scheduler, it supports the owners of remote information resources to implement specific individual preference schemes for specific external needs; at the same time, it is compatible with the independent maintenance functions of each subsystem; the central system only performs comprehensive overall scheduling for these subsystems, and matters within them retain their own management control. Obviously, a city's split and combined hierarchical information processing structure system has well absorbed the advantages of a single centralized unified scheduling and a single distributed independent processing, so the integration of emergency linkage management information is more hierarchical [20] as shown in Figures 2(a)-2(c): In the process of local government emergency information integration, the main body of integration should extract the commonalities and individual characteristics in the information resource integration channels according to the current supply and demand of local actual information, human resources, and other resources, using the splitcombined hierarchical model to interconnect the different information integration channels, form an abstract model of emergency management information integration channels, and establish a concrete model according to the government affairs process, that is, the coexistence of multiple integration modes of component order integration, conditional selection integration, repeated integration, and parallel integration. e emergency information management platform of a city has constructed four routing relationships of parallel, condition, repetition, and sequence in accordance with the logical rules of the business processes of each department, so that the entire emergency information integration process has been interconnected, and significant results have been achieved in both the information update cycle and the information communication function.…”
Section: Investigation Of the Existing Emergency Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this hierarchical structure model, there is a centralized and closed unified scheduler, which centralizes all the emergency information resources in the whole region and then hands them over to the main program, while the regional management information resources and organizational coordination information are passed through another independent is done by the scheduler, it supports the owners of remote information resources to implement specific individual preference schemes for specific external needs; at the same time, it is compatible with the independent maintenance functions of each subsystem; the central system only performs comprehensive overall scheduling for these subsystems, and matters within them retain their own management control. Obviously, a city's split and combined hierarchical information processing structure system has well absorbed the advantages of a single centralized unified scheduling and a single distributed independent processing, so the integration of emergency linkage management information is more hierarchical [20] as shown in Figures 2(a)-2(c): In the process of local government emergency information integration, the main body of integration should extract the commonalities and individual characteristics in the information resource integration channels according to the current supply and demand of local actual information, human resources, and other resources, using the splitcombined hierarchical model to interconnect the different information integration channels, form an abstract model of emergency management information integration channels, and establish a concrete model according to the government affairs process, that is, the coexistence of multiple integration modes of component order integration, conditional selection integration, repeated integration, and parallel integration. e emergency information management platform of a city has constructed four routing relationships of parallel, condition, repetition, and sequence in accordance with the logical rules of the business processes of each department, so that the entire emergency information integration process has been interconnected, and significant results have been achieved in both the information update cycle and the information communication function.…”
Section: Investigation Of the Existing Emergency Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IS integration has been researched in various contexts, including customer relationship management in the pharmaceutical industry (Svoboda et al, 2021), project success in government units (Kolasa et al, 2020), green environment (Bakolo, 2019), small and medium-sizes enterprises (SMEs) (Francalanci & Morabito, 2008;Raymond et al, 2013), supply chains (Hou, 2019;Kauremaa & Tanskanen, 2016;Rajaguru & Matanda, 2013;Zhang et al 2022), manufacturing (Lee et al, 2022), health informatics (Dlodlo & Hamunyela, 2017), healthcare management (Wu & Trigo, 2021), mergers and acquisitions (Chang et al, 2014;Henningsson & Kettinger, 2017;Tanriverdi & Uysal, 2011), IT spending on cybersecurity measures (Baskerville et al, 2018), and IT vendors (Ceci et al, 2019). IS integration has also been studied from intra-and interorganizational perspectives and in for-profit organizations (Chowanetz et al, 2012;Rajaguru & Matanda, 2013;Wong et al, 2015), but little research has been conducted on IS integration from an intraorganizational perspective in higher education.…”
Section: Review Of the Literature And Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estas variables son: calidad del servicio, utilidad percibida y satisfacción. No obstante, es común que las organizaciones ignoren o subestimen aquellos factores que pueden influir en su éxito (Ha y Ahn, 2014;Kolasa et al, 2020), por lo cual el modelo propuesto contempla la integración de factores del ámbito organizacional (apoyo de la alta dirección y la capacitación sobre el uso del sistema) que puedan influir en su correcta aplicación y funcionamiento. Por lo tanto, a los factores determinantes de éxito se les puede calificar como entradas para aquellas variables que permitan estimar el éxito de un SI, mientras que como salidas las detectadas para capturar los beneficios obtenidos, por ejemplo, mediante una adecuada calidad en los servicios ofrecidos por el staff de informática, la utilidad percibida o la satisfacción por el uso del SI, sean estas a nivel organizacional o en forma individual, en otras palabras, el modelo propuesto involucra causalidad, por lo que a continuación se presenta la defensa de las hipótesis planteadas.…”
Section: Revisión De La Literatura Y Formulación Del Modelo De Invest...unclassified