Information System of Performance Assesment on Startup Business using Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique Exploiting Ranks (SMARTER)

Abstract

Performance evaluation system has a very strategic role in improving the performance of a company. Companies generally judge performance based only on the financial aspect only, regardless of other aspects that are also not less important. This study aims to build a performance evaluation system using a Balanced Scorecard perspective framework that is a financial perspective, customer perspective, internal business process perspective and learning and growth perspective, which can assist decision makers in evaluating performance and prioritizing competitive alternative measures in enhancing the achievement of strategic objectives company. Implementation of the Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique Exploiting Ranks (SMARTER) method of performance evaluation system provides the right performance evaluation data. The data were obtained by calculating the criteria and sub-criteria weightings from 4 perspectives and 14 key performance indicators (KPIs) based on the BSC perspective using Rank Order Centroid (ROC) weighting to obtain criteria and sub-criteria rating according to importance level. Base on case studies, the results of this research indicate that the perspective of internal business processes with a priority weight of 0.521 is the most important perspective in evaluating business startup performance, then the customer perspective with a weight of 0.271, then learning and growth perspective with a weight of 0.146 and perspective finance with a weight of 0.063. While the asset turnover performance indicator with a weight value of 0.009 and profit investment with a weight of 0.004 from a financial perspective are important factors for improvement.

Overview of the factors that influence the competitiveness of startups: a systematized literature review

“…From 2006, other factors started to be incorporated into research in startups, such as their location in technological and scientific parks (Dettwiler et al, 2006). The years 2018 and 2019 showed great growth in research on startups' competitiveness, in addition to presenting factors related to the political and competitive environment (Gwebu et al, 2019;Kozubikova et al, 2019;Xiao & Zhao, 2017), human capital (Marullo et al, 2018;Tangkesalu & Suseno, 2018), business intelligence (Caseiro & Coelho, 2018), technological capacity (Potjanajaruwit, 2018), innovation (Samaeemofrad & Van Den Herik, 2018a, 2018b, research and development (Rydehell et al, 2019), and intellectual property protection mechanisms (Teixeira & Ferreira, 2019), among others that will be presented during the review.…”

“…The product is information that will allow organizations to predict the behavior of their competitors, suppliers, customers, technologies, acquisitions, markets, products and services, and the general business environment, with a particular degree of certainty (Caseiro & Coelho, 2018, 2019. Similarly, several studies demonstrate that financial capacity (Marullo et al, 2018;Samaeemofrad & Van Den Herik, 2018a, 2018bTangkesalu & Suseno, 2018), technological capacity (Franca Vargas et al, 2016;Marullo et al, 2018;Potjanajaruwit, 2018), and dynamic capacity (Asadinasab et al, 2013;Behl, 2020) influence the competitive power of startups. Behl (2020), from the dynamic capability theory, argues that Big Data Analytics capabilities influence startups' competitiveness as the startup needs to survive and compete with giant companies.…”

Multi-Criteria Decision Making with the VIKOR and SMARTER Methods for Optimal Seller Selection from Several E-Marketplaces

“…This method is based on the theory that each alternative has a number of criteria that contain values, in addition each of these criteria has a weighted describing the importance level compared to other criteria. Determination of priority criteria is usually formed with the statement "criterion 1 is more important than criterion 2, which is more important than criterion 3 and so on until criterion j ", or can be written C1 ≥ C2 ≥ C3 ≥ ... ≥ Cj, to determine its weight can be explained as the following equation [23].…”

Penerapan Metode Smart Pada Pemilihan Gizi Balita Terhadap Covid-19 Di Posyandu Desa Rambung Sialang

“…Metode SMART lebih sering digunakan karena kesederhanaannya dalam merespon kebutuhan pembuat keputusan dan menganalisa respon [21]. Pembobotan pada metode SMART menggunakan rentang antara 0 dan 1, sehingga memudahkan dalam menghitung dan membandingkan nilai pada setiap alternatif [22]. Dari pembobotan indikator tersebut dapat menghasilkan bobot alternatif untuk mengetahui nilai tertinggi dari alternatif yang ada [23].…”