2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-76941-7_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information Scent, Searching and Stopping

Abstract: Abstract. Current models and measures of the Interactive Information Retrieval (IIR) process typically assume that a searcher will always examine the first snippet in a given Search Engine Results Page (SERP), and then with some probability or cutoff, he or she will stop examining snippets and/or documents in the ranked list (snippet level stopping). Prior work has however shown that searchers will form an initial impression of the SERP, and will often abandon a page without clicking on or inspecting in detail… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Information scent is a term derived from the information foraging theory, which explains human information-seeking and sense interface. Information scent refers to information seekers following hints as a form of either visual or textual context in search of the desired information [23,29,30]. A strong information scent can convince users that they will find what they are looking for at the end of the journey.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information scent is a term derived from the information foraging theory, which explains human information-seeking and sense interface. Information scent refers to information seekers following hints as a form of either visual or textual context in search of the desired information [23,29,30]. A strong information scent can convince users that they will find what they are looking for at the end of the journey.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another body of work, Wu et al [20] and others [4,14,15] used information forging theory to better understand how users seek information in the web. Wu et al [20] manipulated the number of the relevant documents in the search results of users first 3 queries', and asked users to search for relevant documents to open-ended question.…”
Section: And Efthimiadismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Unlike Joachims et al [10] and others [14,15,20] where many of their search tasks include multiple relevant documents in the SERP, our focus is not in investigating which document among those that are relevant should the user click at, but on understanding possible causes to how far are users are willing to examine SERPs with either no relevant document or one relevant document placed at different ranks and what motivates users to continue or stop their examination. We aim to understand how different reasons to query abandonment can affect examination and vice-versa, i.e.…”
Section: And Efthimiadismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, users often apply several rounds of search to reformulate their queries further to adhere to their information needs given they find some relevant results. Past work [6,20] demonstrated the use of information scent to model users' information need during web search, and it has been used to understand the factors affecting search and what takes a user to stop the search. Despite the good observation, the exploitation of information scent (from Information Foraging Theory [27]) is under-explored in case of ambiguous queries and have not been extended to take into account an image in query expansion (or suggestion) tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%