2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00296.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information Processing and Policy Dynamics

Abstract: In this article, we trace the evolution of punctuated equilibrium theories of the policy process to the development of a full theory of government information processing. Noting that punctuated equilibrium is one realization of a larger theory of government information processing, we outline a research agenda for the study of agenda setting, policy dynamics, and information flows in the policy process. In doing so, we relate the study of government information processing to such important features of American … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
129
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
129
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The limitations imposed on the policy-making agenda allow a large number of policies to remain ignored for long periods of time, resulting in stability and maintenance of the status quo. Eventually, a policy indicator or public awareness become too large to ignore, and policy makers shift their limited attention to the new issue (Jones, 2001;Jones & Baumgartner, 2005;Simon, 1957;Workman, Jones, & Jochim, 2009).…”
Section: Issue Attention and Policy Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitations imposed on the policy-making agenda allow a large number of policies to remain ignored for long periods of time, resulting in stability and maintenance of the status quo. Eventually, a policy indicator or public awareness become too large to ignore, and policy makers shift their limited attention to the new issue (Jones, 2001;Jones & Baumgartner, 2005;Simon, 1957;Workman, Jones, & Jochim, 2009).…”
Section: Issue Attention and Policy Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As attractive as the standard model is on its face, as a general model of policy change, it is much more limited than analysts realize (Baumgartner, Jones, & Wilkerson, 2011; Workman, Jones, & Jochim, 2009). First, in many cases, major policy change occurs in the absence of electoral change—including such important pieces of legislation in the United States as the Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Act of 2002 (McCain‐Feingold) and the Troubled Asset Relief Program of 2008.…”
Section: The Standard Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Process-oriented theorists perceive organizations first of all as (sometimes progressing in parallel, sometimes serially) sequences of decision-making (cf. Workman et al 2009). For the latter, 'structure' refers to the rules and routines that evolve in and through these processes and which direct the communication of information and the modes of decision-making.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%