1995
DOI: 10.1190/1.1443877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information on elastic parameters obtained from the amplitudes of reflected waves

Abstract: Seismic amplitude variation with offset data contain information on the elastic parameters of geological layers. As the general solution of the inverse problem consists of a probability over the space of all possible earth models, we look at the probabilities obtained using amplitude variation with offset (AVO) data for different choices of elastic parameters. A proper analysis of the information in the data requires a nontrivial definition of the probability defining the state of total ignorance on different … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously pointed out in Section 2.3 and 3.3, the uncertainty (shown by the error bar) of Z p or Z s is less than that of density. The reason is that the density is poorly resolved by P-waves seismic data (Debski and Tarantola, 1995;Igel et al, 1996), but the inverted average density statistically approximates the true density model. rjMCMC.…”
Section: Synthetic Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously pointed out in Section 2.3 and 3.3, the uncertainty (shown by the error bar) of Z p or Z s is less than that of density. The reason is that the density is poorly resolved by P-waves seismic data (Debski and Tarantola, 1995;Igel et al, 1996), but the inverted average density statistically approximates the true density model. rjMCMC.…”
Section: Synthetic Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason is the low sensitivity of the seismic velocity and density to variations in fluid saturation (Castagna and Backus, 1993;Debski and Tarantola, 1995;Plessix and Bork, 2000). A porosity greater than 30% is required to have a significant velocity difference between a water-and hydrocarbon-saturated reservoir.…”
Section: Introduction To the Csem Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In marine reflection seismic data, the presence of only one propagation mode impedes the opportunity to obtain independent estimates of P-wave (Vp) and S-wave velocity (Vs) (Jin et al, 1992;Igel et al, 1996); on the other hand, density is strongly coupled with P-wave velocity at narrow reflection angle; the two parameters can't be effectively resolved and in fact yield a posterior reconstruction of the P-impedance model (Tarantola, 1986;Operto et al, 2013). Here we choose to parametrise the reflectivity of the earth model as a distribution of P-impedance, Poisson's ratio and density (Debski & Tarantola, 1995;Igel et al, 1996), super-imposed to a long-wavelength P-wave velocity model that controls the wavefield kinematic (Tarantola, 1986;Jannane, 1989).…”
Section: A Strategy For the Multi-parameter Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Debski & Tarantola, 1995;Jannane, 1989;Igel et al, 1996). We conduct a sensitivity analysis on a simple homogeneous model with a low impedance 50 cm thick layer, whose density is changed at constant impedance, as a function of the maximum reflection angle at the target.…”
Section: Sensitivity To Constant-impedance Density Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%