Abstract:Texts on visual perception typically begin with the following premise: Vision is an ill-posed problem, and perception is underdetermined by the available information. If this were really the case, however, it is hard to see how vision could ever get off the ground. James Gibson’s signal contribution was his hypothesis that for every perceivable property of the environment, however subtle, there must be a higher order variable of information, however complex, that specifies it—if only we are clever enough to fi… Show more
“… 6 Gibson’s Research Report notably also introduced optical flow fields as a critical component of his theory, but that aspect of his work is not covered here; it is discussed in detail elsewhere in this special issue (Rogers, 2021; Warren, 2021). Gibson’s concept of texture was always about natural textures, with all their variety, but he lacked the tools with which to study them; recent advances in studying the perception of natural materials are also discussed in this special issue (Todd, 2020).…”
J. J. Gibson's ground theory of space perception is contrasted with Descartes’ theory, which reduces all of space perception to the perception of distance and angular direction, relative to an abstract viewpoint. Instead, Gibson posits an embodied perceiver, grounded by gravity, in a stable layout of realistically textured, extended surfaces and more delimited objects supported by these surfaces. Gibson's concept of optical contact ties together this spatial layout, locating each surface relative to the others and specifying the position of each object by its location relative to its surface of support. His concept of surface texture—augmented by perspective structures such as the horizon—specifies the scale of objects and extents within this layout. And his concept of geographical slant provides surfaces with environment-centered orientations that remain stable as the perceiver moves around. Contact-specified locations on extended environmental surfaces may be the unattended primitives of the visual world, rather than egocentric or allocentric distances. The perception of such distances may best be understood using Gibson's concept of affordances. Distances may be perceived only as needed, bound through affordances to the particular actions that require them.
“… 6 Gibson’s Research Report notably also introduced optical flow fields as a critical component of his theory, but that aspect of his work is not covered here; it is discussed in detail elsewhere in this special issue (Rogers, 2021; Warren, 2021). Gibson’s concept of texture was always about natural textures, with all their variety, but he lacked the tools with which to study them; recent advances in studying the perception of natural materials are also discussed in this special issue (Todd, 2020).…”
J. J. Gibson's ground theory of space perception is contrasted with Descartes’ theory, which reduces all of space perception to the perception of distance and angular direction, relative to an abstract viewpoint. Instead, Gibson posits an embodied perceiver, grounded by gravity, in a stable layout of realistically textured, extended surfaces and more delimited objects supported by these surfaces. Gibson's concept of optical contact ties together this spatial layout, locating each surface relative to the others and specifying the position of each object by its location relative to its surface of support. His concept of surface texture—augmented by perspective structures such as the horizon—specifies the scale of objects and extents within this layout. And his concept of geographical slant provides surfaces with environment-centered orientations that remain stable as the perceiver moves around. Contact-specified locations on extended environmental surfaces may be the unattended primitives of the visual world, rather than egocentric or allocentric distances. The perception of such distances may best be understood using Gibson's concept of affordances. Distances may be perceived only as needed, bound through affordances to the particular actions that require them.
“…• "Perceiving is an achievement of the individual, not an appearance in the theater of his consciousness. It is a keeping-in-touch with the world, an experiencing of things rather than a having of experiences" [5].…”
Section: Box 1 American Naturalism As Radical Empiricismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Directly perceiving is a matter of detecting and differentiating what's significant rather than constructing or inferring meaning through processing and interpreting sensory inputs. Perception, so conceived, is no longer an ill-posed problem [5], requiring prior knowledge and complex interpretation of sensory representations. See Box 1.…”
Unpublished letter in response to Hafri, A., & Firestone, C. (2021). The perception of relations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.01.006
“…Optic flow has several functions for behaving observers (see, e.g., Lee, 1980 ). For instance, observers can perceive their direction of self-motion from optic flow ( Gibson, 1947 , 1950 ; Warren, 1976 ; Warren et al, 1988 ; see Warren, 2008 for a review), and optic flow provides visual guidance for many actions ( Warren, 1998 , 2021 ) such as steering to a target ( Calvert, 1954 ; Gibson, 1958 ; Warren et al, 2001 ), balance and posture control ( Lee & Aronson, 1974 ; Stoffregen, 1985 ) and avoiding or achieving collisions ( Fajen, 2008 ; Lee, 1976 ). Optic flow furthermore plays an important role in the perception of the shape of objects and the layout of the environment ( Koenderink, 1986 ; Rogers, 2021 ; Todd, 1995).…”
The concept of optic flow, a global pattern of visual motion that is both caused by and signals self-motion, is canonically ascribed to James Gibson's 1950 book “ The Perception of the Visual World.” There have, however, been several other developments of this concept, chiefly by Gwilym Grindley and Edward Calvert. Based on rarely referenced scientific literature and archival research, this article describes the development of the concept of optic flow by the aforementioned authors and several others. The article furthermore presents the available evidence for interactions between these authors, focusing on whether parts of Gibson's proposal were derived from the work of Grindley or Calvert. While Grindley's work may have made Gibson aware of the geometrical facts of optic flow, Gibson's work is not derivative of Grindley's. It is furthermore shown that Gibson only learned of Calvert's work in 1956, almost a decade after Gibson first published his proposal. In conclusion, the development of the concept of optic flow presents an intriguing example of convergent thought in the progress of science.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.