2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-25498-8_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information Diffusion in Social Networks: Friendship Paradox Based Models and Statistical Inference

Abstract: Dynamic models and statistical inference for the diffusion of information in social networks is an area which has witnessed remarkable progress in the last decade due to the proliferation of social networks. Modeling and inference of diffusion of information has applications in targeted advertising and marketing, forecasting elections, predicting investor sentiment and identifying epidemic outbreaks. This chapter discusses three important aspects related to information diffusion in social networks: (i) How doe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) The edge formation protocol proposed in this paper assumes homogeneity among users in one community, i.e., users' community information solely determines their edge formation probabilities. An interesting future direction is to incorporate heterogeneity (e.g., preferential attachment with fitness) into the network model and apply methods such as friendship paradox sampling [34], [35], [36] to assign different weights to the 2 hop connections between different pairs of users. 2) Another interesting direction is to consider ARM's parameter (e.g., the recommendation acceptance probability) depends on users' actions and incorporates a feedback law, i.e., ARM raises the acceptance probability when users become more segregated in network.…”
Section: Limitations and Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) The edge formation protocol proposed in this paper assumes homogeneity among users in one community, i.e., users' community information solely determines their edge formation probabilities. An interesting future direction is to incorporate heterogeneity (e.g., preferential attachment with fitness) into the network model and apply methods such as friendship paradox sampling [34], [35], [36] to assign different weights to the 2 hop connections between different pairs of users. 2) Another interesting direction is to consider ARM's parameter (e.g., the recommendation acceptance probability) depends on users' actions and incorporates a feedback law, i.e., ARM raises the acceptance probability when users become more segregated in network.…”
Section: Limitations and Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results for the case 1 and case 2 also fall under this broad theme. Apart from the applications in estimation problems, friendship paradox has also been explored in the contexts of perception biases in social networks [18], [19], [20], information diffusion and opinion formation [21], [22], [23], [24], influence maximization and stochastic seeding [25], [26], [27], node properties other than the degrees [28], [29], [30] and directed social networks [18], [28], [31].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…intending to vote for a certain political party) on an undirected social network. Apart from these, [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] also explore further effects and generalizations of friendship paradox.…”
Section: B Use Of Friendship Paradox In Estimation Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%