2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1908.00310
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Power-law Degree Distributions via Friendship Paradox based Sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future directions of this work include further improving the accuracy of the proposed method using different sampling methods based on friendship paradox (e.g. [24], [25], [26]); enriching this framework to handle more sophisticated network topologies such as heterogeneous graphs; incorporating the hidden Markov bridge model with generation models to forecast opinion dynamics (e.g. [20], [31], [32]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Future directions of this work include further improving the accuracy of the proposed method using different sampling methods based on friendship paradox (e.g. [24], [25], [26]); enriching this framework to handle more sophisticated network topologies such as heterogeneous graphs; incorporating the hidden Markov bridge model with generation models to forecast opinion dynamics (e.g. [20], [31], [32]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume that γN of the total N edges are uniformly sampled and observed at each time t (random sampling of edges has been used widely in literature in statistical estimation tasks e.g. [24], [25], [26]). γ is a fixed ratio in (0, 1].…”
Section: Measuring Conductance Via Sampled Edgesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) The edge formation protocol proposed in this paper assumes homogeneity among users in one community, i.e., users' community information solely determines their edge formation probabilities. An interesting future direction is to incorporate heterogeneity (e.g., preferential attachment with fitness) into the network model and apply methods such as friendship paradox sampling [34], [35], [36] to assign different weights to the 2 hop connections between different pairs of users. 2) Another interesting direction is to consider ARM's parameter (e.g., the recommendation acceptance probability) depends on users' actions and incorporates a feedback law, i.e., ARM raises the acceptance probability when users become more segregated in network.…”
Section: Limitations and Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Friendship paradox has recently gained attention in several applications related to networks under the broad theme "how network biases can be used effectively for estimation problems?". For example, [14], [15] show how friendship paradox can be utilized for accurate estimation of a heavy tailed degree distribution, [16], [17] show how friendship paradox can be used for quickly detecting a disease outbreak. Our results for the case 1 and case 2 also fall under this broad theme.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%