1995
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information Costs and Location of FDIs within the Host Country: Empirical Evidence from Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
102
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
9
102
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noteworthy to mention that information acquisition involves cost; therefore, in a world full of incomplete and asymmetric information, institutions help economic agents to economize on the basis of information and transaction costs (Hoskisson et al, 2000;Mudambi & Navarra, 2002). Due to high information cost that foreign investors have to incur relative to their counterparts local investors; the location decisions behaviours of foreign firms are informational driven (Goldstein & Razin, 2006;Mariotti & Piscitello, 1995). As a location response to the information asymmetry and uncertainties in foreign markets; foreign investors are likely to choose investment locations which offer better access to information in order to minimize their information cost (Azubuike, 2006;He, 2002;Mariotti & Piscitello, 1995).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy to mention that information acquisition involves cost; therefore, in a world full of incomplete and asymmetric information, institutions help economic agents to economize on the basis of information and transaction costs (Hoskisson et al, 2000;Mudambi & Navarra, 2002). Due to high information cost that foreign investors have to incur relative to their counterparts local investors; the location decisions behaviours of foreign firms are informational driven (Goldstein & Razin, 2006;Mariotti & Piscitello, 1995). As a location response to the information asymmetry and uncertainties in foreign markets; foreign investors are likely to choose investment locations which offer better access to information in order to minimize their information cost (Azubuike, 2006;He, 2002;Mariotti & Piscitello, 1995).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is often argued in the literature that the market served by foreign firms is rarely limited to a 'location', especially if the 'location' is small, like the Romanian counties in our study (e.g., COUGHLIN andSEGEV, 2000 andMARIOTTI andPISCITELLO, 1995). Hence, we include the (log of the) broader regional GDP rather than the county-level GDP in order to more accurately measure market potential.…”
Section: Other Location Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, uncertainty with regard to locational quality and subsequent information and search costs are much higher for foreign compared to domestic investors (CAVES, 1996). Since an existing concentration of foreign firms facilitates the gathering of information on the local environment, either via business relationships or because it demonstrates the location's potential, economies from foreign agglomeration may be very important for international investors but less so for domestic ones (e.g., MARIOTTI and PISCITELLO, 1995;GUIMARÃES et al, 2000). More generally, a number of studies have found that foreign companies value various location factors different than domestic firms (e.g., WOODWARD, 1988 and1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper is not the first one that analyses location choices of multinational firms in Italy. Some other works have addressed the question of why some regions and provinces attract more FDI than other regions within Italy (Mariotti and Piscitello, 1995;Basile, 2002 andBronzini, 2004). However, in the present work we frame the choice of whether to locate in Italy in the broader context of locating in the EU.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%