2013
DOI: 10.4236/ns.2013.58a1007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influential aspects on seismic performance of confined masonry construction

Abstract: Recent earthquakes around the world have resulted in loss of human lives and high economic losses due to poor performance of unreinforced masonry constructions as well as poorly-built reinforced concrete framed buildings. This has necessitated alternative building technologies with improved seismic performance. Confined masonry (CM) construction, has shown excellent behavior during past earthquakes across the world and requires similar skill at a marginally higher cost than that of unreinforced masonry. This p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DARR method relies heavily on the choice of the relative displacement or interstory drift limits used for the damage assessment. Currently, the literature provides both interstory drift (e.g., Borzi et al, 2008;Shahzada et al, 2011;Chourasia et al, 2016;Minas and Galasso, 2019) and relative displacement limits (e.g., Lagomarsino and Giovinazzi, 2006;Frankie et al, 2013;Lestuzzi et al, 2016). Each set of limit values is derived based on different assumptions and for specific building typologies and study areas, and their use and validity depends on the typology dynamic behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DARR method relies heavily on the choice of the relative displacement or interstory drift limits used for the damage assessment. Currently, the literature provides both interstory drift (e.g., Borzi et al, 2008;Shahzada et al, 2011;Chourasia et al, 2016;Minas and Galasso, 2019) and relative displacement limits (e.g., Lagomarsino and Giovinazzi, 2006;Frankie et al, 2013;Lestuzzi et al, 2016). Each set of limit values is derived based on different assumptions and for specific building typologies and study areas, and their use and validity depends on the typology dynamic behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the load-deformation behaviour depends on various factors, such as wall aspect ratio, material strength, type of wall-to-tie-column interface, detailing of tie-columns, wall openings and overburden pressure. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Review Of Past Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earthquakes and laboratory tests show the effectiveness of confined masonry systems. The seismic performance is also influenced by the masonry properties, structure configuration and reinforcement in tie columns and tie beams [8]. The literature shows that slender masonry walls may experience buckling to axial force [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%