Summary Eight half‐scale brick masonry walls were tested to study two important aspects of confined masonry (CM) walls related to its seismic behavior under in‐plane and out‐of‐plane loads. Four solid wall specimens tested to investigate the role of type of interface between the masonry and tie‐columns, such as toothing varying from none to every course. The other four specimens with openings were tested to study the effectiveness of various strengthening options around opening to mitigate their negative influence. In the set of four walls, one wall was infilled frame while the other three were CM walls of different configurations. The experimental results were further used to determine the accuracy of various existing models in predicting the in‐plane response quantities of CM walls. Confined masonry walls maintained structural integrity even when severely damaged and performed much better than infill frames. No significant effect of toothing details was noticed although toothing at every brick course was preferred for better post‐peak response. For perforated walls, provision of vertical elements along with continuous horizontal bands around openings was more effective in improving the overall response. Several empirical and semi‐empirical equations are available to estimate the lateral strength and stiffness of CM walls, but those including the contribution of longitudinal reinforcement in tie‐columns provided better predictions. The available equations along with reduction factors proposed for infills could not provide good estimates of strength and stiffness for perforated CM walls. However, recently proposed relations correlating strength/stiffness with the degree of confinement provided reasonable predictions for all wall specimens. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

No abstract

Some traditional designs of masonry structures have shown acceptable structural performance during past earthquakes. In these structures, a grid of horizontal, vertical, and/or diagonal elements divide a large wall into smaller wall areas and provide confinement to masonry panels. In addition, grid elements provide a definite shearing plane along which masonry blocks can slide adding to deformability and energy-dissipation capacity. Inclined elements significantly add to lateral stiffness and strength depending on whether they can develop a complete truss action for lateral loads. Cyclic tests were conducted on five half-scaled wall specimens with different sub-paneling schemes using RC precast grid elements. Experimental results and finite element studies were used to develop simplified predictive relations for strength and stiffness response based on a confinement factor representing the grid element density. These relations can be used to configure the grid elements for desired performance levels with additional inputs about the global behavior.

Framed masonry panels are subjected to both in-plane and out-of-plane loading during earthquakes and their load-carrying capacity in the out-of-plane direction after being damaged is crucial for overall stability and safety. To assess the effect of in-plane damage on their out-of-plane behavior, three half-scaled clay brick framed masonry panels were subjected to a sequence of slow cyclic in-plane drifts and shake table-generated out-of-plane ground motions. The framed panels maintained structural integrity and out-of-plane stability even when severely damaged. Also, failure of specimens was primarily due to excessive out-of-plane deflection, rather than amplified inertia forces. Weaker interior grid elements divided masonry in smaller subpanels, and helped delay failure by controlling out-of-plane deflection and significantly enhancing the in-plane response. This subpaneling also greatly improved the in-plane response and energy dissipation potential, and consequently, the out-of-plane failure of the masonry was delayed and large in-plane drifts of up to 2.2% could be safely sustained.

No abstract