2015
DOI: 10.1080/10967494.2014.996628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influencing Citizen Coproduction by Sending Encouragement and Advice: A Field Experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, a better understanding of public policy helps establish a motivational basis for compliance (Alford ; Van Eijk and Steen ). This is because citizens’ improved understanding of a policy likely corresponds to greater awareness of how the act of complying with the policy will benefit them or their community (Thomsen and Jakobsen ). To this end, a better understanding of a policy can incentivize compliance (Weaver ).…”
Section: Voluntary Policy Compliance and Policy Understandingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conversely, a better understanding of public policy helps establish a motivational basis for compliance (Alford ; Van Eijk and Steen ). This is because citizens’ improved understanding of a policy likely corresponds to greater awareness of how the act of complying with the policy will benefit them or their community (Thomsen and Jakobsen ). To this end, a better understanding of a policy can incentivize compliance (Weaver ).…”
Section: Voluntary Policy Compliance and Policy Understandingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from motivation, there is also evidence to suggest that understanding can help overcome constraints that would otherwise inhibit intentions to voluntarily comply. For example, greater policy understanding can help clarify what a citizen needs to do in order to comply with a policy (Thomsen and Jakobsen ).…”
Section: Voluntary Policy Compliance and Policy Understandingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies suggested situational factors and showed that having access to resources (Jakobsen, 2013) and expecting personal benefits (Thomsen & Jakobsen, 2015) positively influence engagement in coproduction, whereas extrinsic rewards seem to have only marginal influence on the engagement of citizens (Voorberg et al, 2018). We expand on these findings and consider coproduction as a lowcost or multiple-exit situation (Latsis, 1972).…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Reference to the citizens' personal benefit, on the other hand, seems to have less impact on increasing coproduction behavior. For instance, a study has shown that the distribution of brochures about why it is beneficial to practice reading skills with children increased coproduction behavior in parents but only for a very short amount of time (Thomsen & Jakobsen, 2015). Likewise, offering financial incentives as a personal benefit increased coproduction in language classes for refugees but only marginally (Voorberg, et al, 2018).…”
Section: Situational Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While their application in co-production research is still sparse, experiments hold much potential. In order to study the antecedents of coproduction of health care among service users or volunteers, researchers can, for example, randomly distribute information or materials targeting at increasing coproduction efforts (e.g., Jakobsen 2013; Thomsen & Jakobsen 2015), and map whether motivation and resources might be necessary and sufficient to enhance coproduction of health services among service users and volunteers. In this way, scholars might induce exogenous variation in antecedents of coproduction of health care to assess their true effects on actual coproduction behavior.…”
Section: Two Shortcomings In Existing Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%