Influência do grau de escolaridade no teste de Identificação de Sentenças Dicóticas em Português Brasileiro

Andrade, Adriana Neves de; Silva, Mariane Richetto da; Iório, Maria Cecília Martinelli; Gil, Daniela

doi:10.1590/2317-1782/20152014205

Cited by 7 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…When the DSI performances are compared between the ears, it is noticed that the right ear has better results in both stages of the test (Table 2). This information corroborates the study that aimed to generate reference values for the DSI 26 . The research consisted of a sample of 200 subjects with normal thresholds, aged between 13 and 49 years old, which showed a superior performance of the right ear, as the age increased.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

“…Also in the same table are the reference values for the DSI, in which it is emphasized that the performance of the elderly was not affected by hearing loss, in both stages of the test application, which corroborates the literature, since originally the DSI was developed to be applied to subjects with peripheral hearing loss, being minimally affected by it 25 . Therefore also, in their version of Brazilian Portuguese, the authors first sought reference values for the population with good hearing acuity 26 . It is also noteworthy that the values of the directed listening stage are better than in the binaural integration stage, corroborating the findings of this recent study 26 , which pointed out that in the directed stage, subjects without central auditory processing disorder are able to direct your auditory attention.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore also, in their version of Brazilian Portuguese, the authors first sought reference values for the population with good hearing acuity 26 . It is also noteworthy that the values of the directed listening stage are better than in the binaural integration stage, corroborating the findings of this recent study 26 , which pointed out that in the directed stage, subjects without central auditory processing disorder are able to direct your auditory attention.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The study of responses to auditory processing tests in the elderly

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: to generate reference values for different central auditory processing tests, investigating the influence of peripheral hearing and considering education and cognition, in the elderly. Methods: a prospective, quantitative and cross-sectional study. The casuistry consisted of 23 elderly, aged between 60 and 81 years old, being 8 men and 14 women. Regarding the audiological characteristics, the elderly were included with normal auditory thresholds or mild and moderate sensorineural hearing loss, classified by the quadritonal average, proposed by the World Health Organization. All elderly underwent Basic Audiological Evaluation, Edinburgh Handedness Inventory, Mini Mental State Examination, and seven central auditory behavioral tests. Statistical analysis was performed using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test. Results: the Adapted Time-Compressed Speech Test was influenced by the peripheral hearing loss, in both ears (p-value = 0,000), and no significant differences were found in the other data analyzed. Conclusion: reference values were generated for the different behavioral tests. Hearing loss influenced the results of the Adapted Time-Compressed Speech Test, suggesting that it should not be applied in the elderly with peripheral alteration. Regarding education and cognition, there was a similarity among the elderly with normal hearing thresholds and those presented with hearing loss.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The study of responses to auditory processing tests in the elderly

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Adult subjects of both genders, aged between 18 and 59 years old, were invited to participate in the present study. Those who met the following eligibility criteria participated in the sample: auditory thresholds up to 25 dBnHL in frequencies from 250 to 8000 Hz bilaterally; at least 8 years of schooling; values of normality in the Dichotic Sentence Identification (DSI) test in the integration stage; 10 to not have external and middle ear alterations, identified by tympanometry; to not have a history of head trauma and/or stroke; to not present obvious neurological or psychiatric changes.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mismatch Negativity Occurrence with Verbal and Nonverbal Stimuli in Normal-Hearing Adults

Bruckmann

Garcia

2020

Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionThe mismatch negativity (MMN) is a long-latency auditory evoked potential related to a passive elicited auditory event.Objective To verify the occurrence of MMN with different stimuli, to describe reference values in normal-hearing adults with verbal and nonverbal stimuli and to compare them with each other, besides analyzing the latency, area, and amplitude regarding gender and between the ears. Method Normal-hearing individuals, aged between 18 and 59 years old, participated in the study. As inclusion criterion in the study, all of them underwent tone threshold audiometry, logoaudiometry, tympanometry, and the Dichotic Sentence Identification (DSI) test, and later the MMN with 4 different stimuli, being 2 verbal (da/ta and ba/di) and 2 nonverbal stimuli (750/1,000Hz and 750/4,000Hz), which are considered stimuli with low and high contrast.Results A total of 90 individuals composed the sample, being 39 males and 51 females, with an average age of 26.9 years old. In the analysis of the latency, amplitude, and area of the four stimuli between the ears, they were not considered statistically different. There was a significant difference between all of the stimuli in terms of latency, amplitude and area, with the highest latency found in da/ta, and the greatest amplitude and area in ba/di. Regarding gender, there was only difference in the latency of the da/ta stimulus. Conclusion The da/ta and 750/1,000Hz stimuli elicited the most MMN in the population of normal-hearing adults. Among the genders, there was difference only regarding the latency of the verbal stimulus da/ta, and there was no difference between the ears.

show abstract

“…To participate in the survey, volunteers should meet the following eligibility criteria: auditory thresholds up to 25 dBHL in frequencies from 250 to 8,000 Hz bilaterally; minimum of eight years of schooling (complete elementary education); have no external and middle ear alterations identified by tympanometry; have no history of head injury and/or stroke; did not have evident neurological or psychiatric alterations and presented values of normality in the dichotic sentence identification (DSI) test, 25 which served as a screening for auditory processing alterations.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mismatch Negativity Elicited by Verbal and Nonverbal Stimuli: Comparison with Potential N1

Bruckmann

Garcia

2019

Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction Mismatch negativity (MMN) is a long latency auditory evoked potential, represented by a negative wave, generated after the potential N1 and visualized in a resulting wave. Objective To identify the time of occurrence of MMN after N1, elicited with verbal and nonverbal stimuli. Methods Ninety individuals aged between 18 and 56 years old participated in the study, 39 of whom were male and 51 female, with normal auditory thresholds, at least 8 years of schooling, and who did not present auditory processing complaints. All of them underwent audiologic anamnesis, visual inspection of external auditory meatus, pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry, acoustic immittance measures and the dichotic sentence identification test as a screening for alterations in auditory processing, a requirement to participate in the sample. The MMN was applied with two different stimuli, with these being da/ta (verbal) and 750 Hz and 1,000 Hz (nonverbal). Results There was a statistically significant difference between the latency values of the N1 potential and the MMN with the two stimuli, as well as between the MMN with verbal and nonverbal stimuli, and the latency of the MMN elicited with da/ta being greater than that elicited with 750 Hz and 1,000 Hz, which facilitated its visualization. Conclusion The time of occurrence of MMN after the N1 elicited with verbal stimuli was 100.4 ms and with nonverbal stimuli 85.5 ms. Thus, the marking of the MMN with verbal stimuli proved to be more distant from N1 compared with the nonverbal stimuli.

show abstract

Influência do grau de escolaridade no teste de Identificação de Sentenças Dicóticas em Português Brasileiro

Cited by 7 publications

References 16 publications

The study of responses to auditory processing tests in the elderly

The study of responses to auditory processing tests in the elderly

Mismatch Negativity Occurrence with Verbal and Nonverbal Stimuli in Normal-Hearing Adults

Mismatch Negativity Elicited by Verbal and Nonverbal Stimuli: Comparison with Potential N1

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About