2014
DOI: 10.1590/rou.2014.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influência do diâmetro foraminal do canal radicular, do tipo e da penetração de agulha, e do fluxo da solução irrigadora na limpeza e na extrusão apical

Abstract: Influência do diâmetro foraminal do canal radicular, do tipo e da penetração de agulha, e do fluxo da solução irrigadora na limpeza e na extrusão apical Descritores: Endodontia; irrigantes do canal radicular; radiologia. Abstract Introduction:The root canal irrigation aims to clean and disinfect the root canal system, without causing apical extrusion. Objective: To evaluate the influence of apical foramen diameter, needle penetration depth and needle design, and the irrigating solution flow rate on the cleanin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study by Tanomaru-Filho et al, 23 12 mandibular incisors were instrumented and, after foraminal enlargement with different diameters (#40 and #60), the root canals were filled with radiopaque solution thickened with propylene glycol and zinc oxide. Two types of irrigation 27G needles were used, with different designs (apical or side opening), with two streams corresponding to 15 or 25 mL/min, and penetration of the needles in two depths (3 and 6 mm short from the apex).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a study by Tanomaru-Filho et al, 23 12 mandibular incisors were instrumented and, after foraminal enlargement with different diameters (#40 and #60), the root canals were filled with radiopaque solution thickened with propylene glycol and zinc oxide. Two types of irrigation 27G needles were used, with different designs (apical or side opening), with two streams corresponding to 15 or 25 mL/min, and penetration of the needles in two depths (3 and 6 mm short from the apex).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,20,22 Removal of smear layer formed after chemical-mechanical preparation, both in manual and mechanical instrumentation, does not raise major concerns, since, with proper enlargement of the cervical, medium and apical thirds and the use of needles with ideal gauge for irrigation, thus allowing insertion near foramen, it allows effective irrigation and removal of debris, thereby decreasing extrusion. 23 The trauma of foramen overinstrumentation, causing disorganization of periapical tissues, does not lead to postoperative sensitivity, regardless of pulp tissue vitality, thus demonstrating that the chemicalmechanical preparation procedure may involve the cemental canal without postinstrumentation consequences to the patient.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%