2005
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2005.50.3.0905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of zooplankton stoichiometry on nutrient sedimentation in a lake system

Abstract: We explored rates and stoichiometry (C : N : P ratios) of sinking particles in a temperate reservoir during a 2-yr period. Plankton was sampled weekly, and a sediment trap placed below the metalimnion collected sinking particles. There were no significant relationships between the stoichiometry of entrapped material and seston or zooplankton stoichiometry. However the differences in the entrapped C : P and N : P ratios between consecutive trap samplings were negatively correlated with the time variations of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some elements are supplied at higher relative rates than they are needed, and consumers excrete these excess nutrients or-in the case of excess carbon -increase their respiration (Darchambeau et al 2003;Anderson et al 2005;Frost et al 2005a). Such consumerdriven nutrient cycling is stoichiometrically constrained (Elser and Urabe 1999) and has been shown to aVect available nutrient ratios in terrestrial (Carline et al 2005) and aquatic (Vanni et al 2002;Frost et al 2004;Darchambeau et al 2005) ecosystems. Models have indicated that herbivore-driven nutrient cycling can alter plant nutrient limitation (Daufresne and Loreau 2001) and plant competition (Grover 2002).…”
Section: Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some elements are supplied at higher relative rates than they are needed, and consumers excrete these excess nutrients or-in the case of excess carbon -increase their respiration (Darchambeau et al 2003;Anderson et al 2005;Frost et al 2005a). Such consumerdriven nutrient cycling is stoichiometrically constrained (Elser and Urabe 1999) and has been shown to aVect available nutrient ratios in terrestrial (Carline et al 2005) and aquatic (Vanni et al 2002;Frost et al 2004;Darchambeau et al 2005) ecosystems. Models have indicated that herbivore-driven nutrient cycling can alter plant nutrient limitation (Daufresne and Loreau 2001) and plant competition (Grover 2002).…”
Section: Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It has played a special role in community ecology in order to explain consumer responses to prey quality (food intake, growth) (Cross et al 2003;Fagan and Denno 2004;DeMott and Pape 2005), competition between consumer species (Hall 2004;Loladze et al 2004) and consumer eVects on prey nutrient composition (Daufresne and Loreau 2001;Hessen et al 2002;Urabe et al 2002). In addition, ES has provided new and comprehensive explanations for wholeecosystem patterns in nutrient Xuxes and food web structure (Elser 2000;Elser et al 2000b;Darchambeau et al 2005).…”
Section: Electronic Supplementary Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in food web structure by fish manipulations might have an important impact on the biochemical composition of the zooplankton compartment. As suggested by the studies of Elser and Foster (1998), Darchambeau et al (2005), and Danger (2007), changes in the quantity and nature of seston and zooplankton might in turn influence the chemical composition of sinking organic matter and deposited organic matter quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the activity of grazers can cause nutrients to be lost across system boundaries by means of plant-unavailable pathways. Examples include sedimentation of nutrient-rich particles from pelagic ecosystems due to selective assimilation processes (28,29), vertical migration of zooplankton causing spatially decoupled assimilation and excretion of key nutrients (cf. ref.…”
Section: What Determines Propensity For Plant-unavailable Loss?mentioning
confidence: 99%