2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.06.146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Volume Fraction and Distribution of Martensite Phase on the Strain Localization in Dual Phase Steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1: intra-phase fracture; void nucleation caused by microcracking within grains or interface decohesion between adjacent grains of the same phase, and 2: interphase fracture; void nucleation caused by interface decohesion between adjacent grains of different phases. A line of thought supported by [44,45,46] who identified decohesion of the ferrite-martensite interface as one mechanism of void nucleation and that those voids grow along ferrite grain boundaries.…”
Section: Ductile Fracturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1: intra-phase fracture; void nucleation caused by microcracking within grains or interface decohesion between adjacent grains of the same phase, and 2: interphase fracture; void nucleation caused by interface decohesion between adjacent grains of different phases. A line of thought supported by [44,45,46] who identified decohesion of the ferrite-martensite interface as one mechanism of void nucleation and that those voids grow along ferrite grain boundaries.…”
Section: Ductile Fracturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A distinct increase of temperature in the gauge section of the tested specimens may also justify the considerable high value of the local deformation of the samples stretched atε 1 . This may be caused by the fact, that the largest local deformations in DP steels are being observed in ferrite, particularly in the zones of ferrite-martensite interfaces [12,13], which are the fracture initiation zones [12,14]. In the course of stretching with the rateε 1 , the temperature rise of the tested sample can intensify the diffusion of carbon to dislocations and phase boundaries, causing the effect of dynamic ageing [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be possibly due to only a slight difference in the mechanical properties, connected with the increased deformation rate. However, in DP steels containing high amounts of martensite, this phase is also subjected to deformation, even in a degree comparable to that of ferrite [14,15] and thus also to fracture [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saai et al 14) proposed that the volume fraction and distribution of martensite in the soft ferrite phase is responsible for strain localization and fracture in DP steels. While the strengthening effect of hard phases, such as martensite in DP steels 15) and δ-ferrite in duplex stainless steels, 16) are extensively investigated, there are few studies on the interactions between α-ferrite and austenite during hot deformation, where α-ferrite is the softer phase and austenite is the harder.…”
Section: Correlation Of Strain Accommodation Factor With the State Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%