2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of ULS acquisition characteristics on tree stem parameter estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensitivity analysis with increasing raster cell sizes as a proxy for decreasing point density suggests that our best models could perform similarly using ALS data instead of TLS, providing point density is greater than 16 pts/m 2 . While the point density of ALS and DLS (laser scanning from drones) point clouds is dependent on the flight altitude and speed, number of flight lines, and scan and pulse rates, the 16 pts/m 2 threshold is attainable by both ALS and DLS [85][86][87]. This threshold is also consistent with the one suggested in a recent study for height estimation of coniferous trees using drone-based LiDAR point clouds of different point densities, which found that height accuracy only worsens at below 17 pts/m 2 [73].…”
Section: Crown Area Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity analysis with increasing raster cell sizes as a proxy for decreasing point density suggests that our best models could perform similarly using ALS data instead of TLS, providing point density is greater than 16 pts/m 2 . While the point density of ALS and DLS (laser scanning from drones) point clouds is dependent on the flight altitude and speed, number of flight lines, and scan and pulse rates, the 16 pts/m 2 threshold is attainable by both ALS and DLS [85][86][87]. This threshold is also consistent with the one suggested in a recent study for height estimation of coniferous trees using drone-based LiDAR point clouds of different point densities, which found that height accuracy only worsens at below 17 pts/m 2 [73].…”
Section: Crown Area Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Above canopy ULS and under canopy ULS were implemented and studied separately in existing applications. According to (Bruggisser et al 2020), half of the stem circumference is required in above canopy ULS data in order to achieve reliable DBH estimates. However, to capture half of the stem circumference for all standing trees in forest using above canopy ULS is a demanding task (Liang et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Method #3 can only be applied under the most restrictive point cloud properties requiring a high-density point cloud; the base of tree stems must be clearly identifiable to apply the cylinder-fitting algorithm [72]. Therefore, this method can mostly be applied when acquiring high-density ULS data under leaf-off conditions.…”
Section: Forest Inventory Attributes Of An Uneven-aged Hardwood Stand Using Uls Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such areas may be costly for an ALS data collection [63] or require too much time for full coverage by ground-based units [64]. More and more studies have demonstrated that ULS provides accurate data with good repeatability [58,[65][66][67][68] and has great potential to support forest inventories (e.g., [57,[66][67][68][69][70][71][72]). Transferability of ITD to ULS data is now actively being investigated (e.g., [73][74][75][76][77]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%