1965
DOI: 10.1093/jee/58.5.965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Tunnel Size and Nesting Medium on Sex Ratios in a Leaf-Cutter Bee, Megachile rotundata12

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the 1:1 sex ratio found in Ipirá was similar to that recorded by SILVA et al (2001) for C. tarsata and for other Centris species such as C. dichrootricha, Centris terminata Smith, 1804 (MORA , C. vittata (PEREIRA et al 1999), and C. analis (JESUS & GARÓFALO 2000, AGUIAR & MARTINS 2002. Several factors can affect solitary bee sex ratios, such as the nesting-cavity diameter (RUST 1998) or length (STEPHEN & OSGOOD 1965), seasonal availability of floral resources, female foraging capacity (TORCHIO & TEPEDINO 1980), differential losses of outer cells (if those contain predominately one of the sexes), as well as the sex ratio of the parental generation (which influences the mating success of subsequently nesting females) (VANDENBERG 1995). Although the reason for the male-biased sex ratio found in B. Grande is unknown, the data suggest that trap-nest dimensions were not involved since similar traps were used in Ipirá, where the sex ratio was 1:1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the 1:1 sex ratio found in Ipirá was similar to that recorded by SILVA et al (2001) for C. tarsata and for other Centris species such as C. dichrootricha, Centris terminata Smith, 1804 (MORA , C. vittata (PEREIRA et al 1999), and C. analis (JESUS & GARÓFALO 2000, AGUIAR & MARTINS 2002. Several factors can affect solitary bee sex ratios, such as the nesting-cavity diameter (RUST 1998) or length (STEPHEN & OSGOOD 1965), seasonal availability of floral resources, female foraging capacity (TORCHIO & TEPEDINO 1980), differential losses of outer cells (if those contain predominately one of the sexes), as well as the sex ratio of the parental generation (which influences the mating success of subsequently nesting females) (VANDENBERG 1995). Although the reason for the male-biased sex ratio found in B. Grande is unknown, the data suggest that trap-nest dimensions were not involved since similar traps were used in Ipirá, where the sex ratio was 1:1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Narrow tunnels force females to construct brood cells of the smaller sex (Longair 1981). Male biased sex ratios in narrow tubes have been reported, e.g., in Megachile rotundata (Stephen and Osgood 1965;Gerber and Klostermeyer 1972;O'Neill et al 2010), Osmia lignaria (Torchio and Tepedino 1980;Tepedino and Torchio 1989), and Osmia bicornis (Raw 1972;Holm Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13592-015-0380-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diameter of the cavity affects the number of leaf pieces needed to construct the cells, with more pieces required as the diameter increases (Stephen andOsgood 1965, Klostermeyer et al 1973). As the cavity diameter increases, the size of the provision increases, as well as the size of the resulting progeny (Stephen and Osgood 1965). The diameter and the length of the cavity also inßuence the female decision as to the sex of her progeny and, thus, the nest-speciÞc sex ratio (Stephen and Osgood 1965).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%