Influence of thermal processing conditions in 3D printing on the crystallinity and mechanical properties of PEEK material

Yang, Chuncheng; Tian, Xiaoyong; Li, Dichen; Cao, Yi; Feng, Zhen; Shi, Changquan

doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.027

Cited by 476 publications

(300 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

256

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In the special case of PEEK printing with FDM, the not highly related parameters are either not involved, such as power characteristics and binder characteristics, or of secondary priority for small parts, such as fill pattern and support structure. Methods for the characterization of printed PEEK samples are mainly scanning electron microscope (SEM) [15,22,23], 3D scanner [15], differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) [13], and water contact angle measurements [23]. These methods mainly assess the dimensional accuracy, surface roughness, microstructure of interface, and crystalline ratio of printed PEEK objects.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Besides the techniques mentioned above, fused deposition modeling (FDM) is currently the most widely used 3D printing strategy and low-cost technology for thermoplastic materials [12]. In the FDM process, a filament is extruded from a nozzle continuously while heated to a semiliquid state, then the filament rapidly adheres with the surrounding material and solidifies, and the deposits follow a certain routine to form the desired shape [13]. The schematic of an FDM PEEK printer is showed in Figure 1.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Parameters Influencing the Outcome of Additive Manufacturing of Tiny Medical Devices Based on PEEK

Wang

Müller

Rumjahn³

et al. 2020

Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this review, we discuss the parameters of fused deposition modeling (FDM) technology used in finished parts made from polyether ether ketone (PEEK) and also the possibility of printing small PEEK parts. The published articles reporting on 3D printed PEEK implants were obtained using PubMed and search engines such as Google Scholar including references cited therein. The results indicate that although many have been experiments conducted on PEEK 3D printing, the consensus on a suitable printing parameter combination has not been reached and optimized parameters for printing worth pursuing. The printing of reproducible tiny-sized PEEK parts with high accuracy has proved to be possible in our experiments. Understanding the relationships among material properties, design parameters, and the ultimate performance of finished objects will be the basis for further improvement of the quality of 3D printed medical devices based on PEEK and to expand the polymers applications.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Parameters Influencing the Outcome of Additive Manufacturing of Tiny Medical Devices Based on PEEK

Wang

Müller

Rumjahn³

et al. 2020

Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…FDM was used, for example, to fabricate PEEK structures which underwent mechanical testing to determine optimum printing parameters [157]. For extrusion based methods, care must be taken with trapped micro-bubbles and temperature management of the head/nozzle, chamber, build-plate, etc., which can affect the mechanical properties and crystallinity of the produced structure [155,158]. Lastly, epoxy functionalized PEEK formulated as a bioink, together with fenchone, was extruded at room temperature and then cross-linked at 380 • C, avoiding thermal stresses during the initial fabrication process [159].…”

Section: Polyether-ether-ketone (Peek)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…rat bone-marrow stromal cells [140]; hMSCs [141] PLA (4. Feature size 1 mm (SLA) [150]; Feature size 20 µm (TPP) [61] Human fetal osteoblasts [145]; human bone-marrow stromal cells [143]; Schwann cells [61]; osteoconductivity [147,158]; bacterial cell colonies [142] PEEK (4. Feature size 25 µm (SLA) [173]; Feature size 5 µm (TPP) [177][178][179]; Inclusion of silk and melanin, storage E: 1-2.5 kPa [134] Anti-bacterial [183]; hMSCs [174] PDMS (4.2.2) Feature size 250 µm [194] Feature size 250 µm (SLA) [195]; Feature size <1 µm (TPP) [196]; E: 0.4-1.7 MPa [199]; E: 0.05-1 MPa [200] Anti-bacterial [47]…”

Section: Sls (31) Fdm (32) Extrusion Bioprinting (33) Light-assistmentioning

confidence: 99%

Engineered 3D Polymer and Hydrogel Microenvironments for Cell Culture Applications

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The realization of biomimetic microenvironments for cell biology applications such as organ-on-chip, in vitro drug screening, and tissue engineering is one of the most fascinating research areas in the field of bioengineering. The continuous evolution of additive manufacturing techniques provides the tools to engineer these architectures at different scales. Moreover, it is now possible to tailor their biomechanical and topological properties while taking inspiration from the characteristics of the extracellular matrix, the three-dimensional scaffold in which cells proliferate, migrate, and differentiate. In such context, there is therefore a continuous quest for synthetic and nature-derived composite materials that must hold biocompatible, biodegradable, bioactive features and also be compatible with the envisioned fabrication strategy. The structure of the current review is intended to provide to both micro-engineers and cell biologists a comparative overview of the characteristics, advantages, and drawbacks of the major 3D printing techniques, the most promising biomaterials candidates, and the trade-offs that must be considered in order to replicate the properties of natural microenvironments.

show abstract

“…24 A granulate-based system with potential medical application is given as prototype by Tseng JW. 25 Focusing on process parameters studies regarding PEEK in extrusion-based AM are very rare, 26 while several investigations in the field of laser sintering of PEEK took place, [27][28][29] where for instance part positioning, part orientation or powder bed temperatures have played an important role for the part quality.…”

Section: Extrusion-based Am Approaches For Psismentioning

confidence: 99%

Cranial polyetheretherketone implants by extrusion–based additive manufacturing: state of the art and prospects

Katschnig¹,

Holzer²

2018

MSEIJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Influence of thermal processing conditions in 3D printing on the crystallinity and mechanical properties of PEEK material

Cited by 476 publications

References 10 publications

Parameters Influencing the Outcome of Additive Manufacturing of Tiny Medical Devices Based on PEEK

Parameters Influencing the Outcome of Additive Manufacturing of Tiny Medical Devices Based on PEEK

Engineered 3D Polymer and Hydrogel Microenvironments for Cell Culture Applications

Cranial polyetheretherketone implants by extrusion–based additive manufacturing: state of the art and prospects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About