2021
DOI: 10.3390/ma14164657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the Type of Cement and the Addition of an Air-Entraining Agent on the Effectiveness of Concrete Cover in the Protection of Reinforcement against Corrosion

Abstract: The concrete cover is the basic protection of the reinforcement against the influence of external factors that may lead to its corrosion. Its effectiveness depends mainly on the composition of the concrete mix, including the cement used. Depending on external environmental factors that may aggressively affect the structure, various types of cements and concrete admixtures are recommended. The paper presents the results of tests that allow us to assess the effect of the type of cement used and the air-entrainin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(45 reference statements)
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although final values of corrosion current intensity in concrete C1(C1.1: i corr = 3.96 µA; C1.2: i corr = 1.11 µA) and C2(C2.1(i corr = 3.07 µA); C2.2(i corr = 3.56 µA) showed a downward trend, when compared to maximum values measured for C1.1 (a drop by 90%);) C1.2 (a drop by 23%);), C2 (a drop by 68%);); C2.2 (a drop by 33%) the majority of these results did not reach the value taken for passivated steel according to [ 29 , 30 ]. Similar trends were found in the papers [ 26 , 31 , 32 , 33 ].…”
Section: Discussion Of the Results Obtainedmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although final values of corrosion current intensity in concrete C1(C1.1: i corr = 3.96 µA; C1.2: i corr = 1.11 µA) and C2(C2.1(i corr = 3.07 µA); C2.2(i corr = 3.56 µA) showed a downward trend, when compared to maximum values measured for C1.1 (a drop by 90%);) C1.2 (a drop by 23%);), C2 (a drop by 68%);); C2.2 (a drop by 33%) the majority of these results did not reach the value taken for passivated steel according to [ 29 , 30 ]. Similar trends were found in the papers [ 26 , 31 , 32 , 33 ].…”
Section: Discussion Of the Results Obtainedmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Another week of extraction did not bring such spectacular changes in corrosion current intensity in the specimens tested, particularly in concrete C2. Although final values of corrosion potential in concrete C1(C1.1(E corr = 540 mV); C1.2(E corr = 752 mV) and C2 (C2.1(E corr = 332 mV); C2.2(E corr = 580 mV) generally showed a downward trend, when compared to maximum values measured for C1.1 (an increase by 0.1%) C1.2 (a drop by 22%), C2 (a drop by 22%); C2.2 (a drop by 40%) the majority of these results did not reach the value taken for passivated steel according to [ 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Discussion Of the Results Obtainedmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That is why investigation in both fields of study as well as studies in the field of protection of reinforcement against corrosion must be continued simultaneously as they are strongly connected and are same importance for effective implementation in practice. Theoretical research of the corrosion distribution along the cross-section of the steel bars is widely researched (Raczkiewicz et al, 2021;Blikharskyy et al, 2020;Blikharskyy et al, 2021b, Lipiński, 2021 and proposed the mathematical approach to their corrosive process modeling.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, plastic cable ducts are commonly used. Similarly, in the case of reinforced concrete (RC) structures, the reinforcement is protected by surrounding concrete [17]. Unfortunately, in practice, we can find existing post-tensioned bridges with only partially grouted or even ungrouted ducts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%