1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0257-8972(98)00554-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the surface roughness on the oxide scale formation on MCrAlY coatings studied in situ by high temperature X-ray diffraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 show the variations of the Meier model compared to the other two models used in this study. The parabolic constant obtained from TGA analysis agrees well with other reported work in the literature [51][52][53], with magnitudes between 10 -10 ~ 10 -14 depending on the temperatures used. Since Meier model was based on the as-sprayed surface, the comparisons with other models were conducted under rough surface conditions.…”
Section: Oxide Growth Kineticssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…8 show the variations of the Meier model compared to the other two models used in this study. The parabolic constant obtained from TGA analysis agrees well with other reported work in the literature [51][52][53], with magnitudes between 10 -10 ~ 10 -14 depending on the temperatures used. Since Meier model was based on the as-sprayed surface, the comparisons with other models were conducted under rough surface conditions.…”
Section: Oxide Growth Kineticssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The surface roughness of the coating increases with increased powder size (Fig. 11), which is consistent with previous observations (Ref [15][16][17]. CO-series coatings have lower surface roughness compared with CONI-series coatings within similar particle size, because of the relatively wellmelted lamellar structure.…”
Section: Cross-sectional Porositysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is preferred that this oxide scale be a continuous, dense a-alumina (a-Al 2 O 3 ) layer (Ref 4), since it protects the metallic overlay coating from further oxidation, due to the low diffusivity of oxygen and metallic elements through the a-alumina layer ( Ref 5). However, many factors, such as starting powder (Ref [6][7][8], alloy chemistry (Ref [9][10][11][12], microstructure of the coating (Ref 13,14), surface condition of the deposited coating (Ref [15][16][17], deposition method and its process parameters (Ref [18][19][20] can affect the composition and the structure of the TGO scale that in turn, can greatly affect the performance of the MCrAlY coatings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stresses in thin oxide films are difficult to measure and the fracture behavior of alumina scales on overlays is not well understood (Ref 12), mainly due to variations in scale microstructures, flaws, and interfacial adhesion as a function of the substrate chemistry, mechanical properties, and surface condition. In addition, there has been relatively little detailed microstructural investigations of the evolution phenomenon of thermally grown oxide (TGO) accumulation on protective overlay coatings after isothermal oxidation (Ref [13][14][15], because spallation and sintering of the damaged scales often complicates or prevents such an analysis. An improved understanding of the microstructures, flaws, and fracture behavior of Al 2 O 3 scales grown under isothermal conditions must be attained before a basis for the long-term structureproperties relationships of these protective oxide layers can be developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%